The study of semantic frames of external body part terms in Persian language

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 Persian Language and Literature Academy

2 Faculty of Farsi Language and Literature

Abstract

This article studies 14 semantic frames of external body part words in Persian. Semantic frame is a knowledge structure required for understanding the meaning of a word or related set of words. Unlike internal body parts (e.g. heart, brain and bones), external body parts (e.g. arm, leg. head and trunk) are observable and can be delineated, therefore their referential meanings seem perfectly clear. Frame semantics is an approach to the study of word meaning or lexical semantics, which holds that lexical meaning can only be properly studied and described considering a particular body of knowledge, known as frames. This theory provides a powerful tool to study lexical meaning. As Evans (2007: 193) puts it “a given word foregrounds a particular part of the semantic frame to which it is relativized, and yet cannot be understood without the other elements which make up the frame. One consequence of this is that a word provides a route through a particular frame. That is, as words relate to slots in the frame, they directly relate certain elements within a frame”. Two questions then arise: 1) how are the principal frames pertaining to body parts are represented in Persian language in  terms of syntactic or morphological structures? 2) What are the semantic elements of these frames? The aim of this study is to recognize semantic domain of body part terms in Persian and to present its realizations in morphology and syntax. For this purpose lexicographic data is mainly used. Considering the body part frames of English on FrameNet as a model, the same frames extracted for Persian language using a Persian dictionary. As a rule of thumb, if a word was defined by reference to a body part, it was concluded that it was related to body frame (e.g. blink: involuntary shutting and opening of the eye). The Findings reveals that among the body-related frames, one of them is the central frame (containing core elements like hand, arm, foot, leg and head), through which other frames are related to body parts, including: 1) body decoration (nail varnish, tattoo), 2) body harm (slap, kick), 3) body part description (black-eyed, ponytail), 4) disease (leprosy, acne), 5) cloth and clothing (gloved, put on a hat), 6) holistic body description (muscular, bony), 7) posture (cross-legged, lying down), 8) body movement (nodding, limp), 9) sense (smell, touch), 10) accessory (belt, earring), 11) body-based sign (handshake, wink), 12) body surface (mole, scar), 13) body care (brushing, shaving). The study also reveales that body frame manifestation is either explicit (e.g. eye, head, lip, foot, hand) or implicit (e.g. kick: foot, brush: tooth, hear: ear). The explicit manifestation of body frame includes a body part word used in word formation processes to make a new word (e.g. eye in eyelash, finger in fingerprint). It is also possible for body frame to be implicitly present in the sense of a word which becomes explicit in the definition of words (kick: to hit someone or something with your foot, smell: something that you notice by using your nose). The main explicit morphological and syntactic structures representing body frame are 1) in phrases and sentences describing an action or an entity related to body, e.g. češme žaponi  (Japanese eye). 2) in noun formation as in gardan-band (lit. neck-tie) (necklace), dahanšuјe (lit. mouth-washer) (mouth lotion). 3) in adjective formation as in češmi, an adjective meaning related to the eye, Gatreјe češmi (eye drop), labsuz (lit. lip-burner), an adjective meaning the quality of a liquid which is very hot and enjoyable. 4) in compound verb formation as in gush dadan (lit. ear-giving) (to listen), pa kardan (lit. foot-doing) (put on shoes). The data also reveales the implicit presence of body frame. The main morphological and syntactic structures representing body frame implicitly are: 1) simple nouns as in the definition of mesvak (toothbrush): an oral hygiene instrument used to clean the teeth, gums, and tongue. 2) simple verb as in the definition of  xarandan (to scratch): to rub your finger nail hard on part of your skin. 3) simple adjectives as in the definition of Guz (hump): a round raised part on a person's or animal's back. 4) compound adjectives as in the definition of siјahčorde (dark skin). The same study may be carried out for internal body part words. The universality of body part terminology across languages of the world has made it an interesting domain of research. The present article sheds light on some aspects of this domain in Persian language.
 
 

Keywords


Andersen, E. S. (1978). Lexical universals of body-part terminology. In J.H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of Human Language(Vol. 3. pp. 335-368). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Atkins, S., & Rundell, M. (2008). The oxford guide to practical lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, V. (2007). A glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fillmore, Ch, J. (1982). Frame semantics. In linguistic society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111-137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.
Fillmore, Ch, J. (2006). Frame semantics. In D. Geeraerts, R. Dirven & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (pp. 373-400). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, Inc.
Fillmore, Ch. J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni Di Seman- tica. VI (2), 222-254.
Fillmore, Ch. J., Johnson, C. R., & Petruck, M. R. L (2003). Background to Framenet.International Journal of Lexicography, 16 (3), 235-250.
Goldberg, A (2012). Verb, structure and semantic frame. Translated by Ezat-Ollah Rostazade.  Name- Ye Farhangestan, 12 (4), 197-207 [in Persian].
Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive linguistics: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lehrer, A. & Kittay, E. F. (1992). Frames, fields, and contrasts. Georgia: Emory University.
Majid, A. (2006). Body part categorisation in Punjabi. Language Sciences, 28(2-3), 241-261.
Majid, A., Enfield, N., van Staden, M. (2006). Parts of the Body: Cross-Linguistic Categorization. Language Sciences, 28(2-3), 137-147.
Razavi, M (2012).  Semantics and Persian Language Thesaurus. Name- Ye Farhangestan, 12 (4), 16-46 [in Persian].
Razavi, M. (1998). Meronymy (Master’s thesis). Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran [in Persian].
Staden, M. V. (2006). The body and its parts in Tidore: A Papuan Language of Eastern Indonesia. Language Sciences,  28. 221–240.
Winston, M. E., Chaffin, R. & Herrmann, D. (1987). A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Trenton State and Hamilton College.