Carl Gustav Jung has paid more attention to arts, including literature, in the study of the psyche. He has divided the artistic creations manner into two parts: psychological and visual (Didehvaraneh). The psychological manner results from consciousness and involves the current and usual experience of life and it seems more logical than Didehvaraneh manner. However, the latter originates from the unconscious and is beyond wisdom, thought and understanding of the human being. In this article, first in an introduction, we have studied the relationship between the art of literature and psychology science within the psychoanalysis school of Jung, and then, the artistic creation’s manner of Didehvaraneh poem and Didehvaraneh poet. The writers of this article believe that Jung’s Didehvaraneh manner is the same as the revelatory manner from which Molana has been changed while saying his sonnets. This manner has its own movement; it means that spiritual exploration happens first; then the poem is written, based on the capacity of the poet to attract revelation and his preparation of intuition. But because this kind of poetry is formed in a particular context, it has an ambiguous language and capability of paraphrasing. Thus, Didehvar artist (i.e. Molana) is both universal and controversial.
Mohamadi, A., & Esmalipour, M. (2012). Readout and analysis of Molana’s sonnets: A Jungian perspective. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 3(6), 155-179. doi: 10.22051/jlr.2013.1036
MLA
Ali Mohamadi; Maryam Esmalipour. "Readout and analysis of Molana’s sonnets: A Jungian perspective", ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 3, 6, 2012, 155-179. doi: 10.22051/jlr.2013.1036
HARVARD
Mohamadi, A., Esmalipour, M. (2012). 'Readout and analysis of Molana’s sonnets: A Jungian perspective', ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 3(6), pp. 155-179. doi: 10.22051/jlr.2013.1036
VANCOUVER
Mohamadi, A., Esmalipour, M. Readout and analysis of Molana’s sonnets: A Jungian perspective. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 2012; 3(6): 155-179. doi: 10.22051/jlr.2013.1036