Differences in Contribution of Lexical Processing Levels in L2 Noun and Verb Processing and their Implications in English Language Teaching

Tabassi Mofrad, Fatemeh; Ghafar Samar, Reza; Akbari, Ramin

doi:10.22051/jlr.2015.1842

Document Type : Research

Authors

https://doi.org/10.22051/jlr.2015.1842

Abstract

Differences in Contribution of Lexical Processing Levels in L2 Noun and Verb Processing and their Implications in English Language Teaching

Fatemeh Tabassi Mofrad[1]

Reza Ghafar Samar[2]

Ramin Akbari[3]

Received: 2014/06/07
Accepted: 2015/04/06

Abstract
In psycholinguistic studies, with regard to cognitive models, conceptual preparation, lexical concepts, lemmas, morphemes, phonological words and phonetic patterns have been proposed as different levels of lexical processing. In previous studies, some theories have suggested the sequencing and the simultaneity of the processing modules; however, the contribution of each specific processing level has not been determined. In this study, with the participation of eighty-six undergraduate students of English Literature, picture naming task was used to determine the differences in contribution of lexical processing levels in second language (L2) noun and verb processing. According to this research, in L2, noun processing is mostly under the influence of the conceptualization stage and verb processing is mostly under the influence of the formulation stage. Therefore, it may be concluded that in language teaching, emphasizing the visual codes of concrete nouns and the morphological features of verbs, specifically facilitate learning. Moreover, with respect to the findings of this research, it may be proposed that nouns have longer retention in comparison with verbs; however, verbs are more subject to incidental learning.

Keywords:
noun and verb Processing, lexical processing levels, picture naming task, English Language teaching, Learning

[1] PhD Candidate, Department of Applied Linguistics, Tarbiat Modraes University, Tehran, Iran, f.tabassimofrad@modares.ac.ir

[2] Associate Professor, Department of Applied Linguistics, Tarbiat Modraes University, Tehran, Iran, rgsamar@modares.ac.ir, ( Corresponding Author).

[3] Associate Professor, Department of Applied Linguistics, Tarbiat Modraes University, Tehran, Iran, akbari_r@modares.ac.ir

Keywords

20.1001.1.20088833.1396.9.22.7.0

References

غفار ثمر، رضا، فاطمه طبسی مفرد و رامین اکبری (1393). «تفاوت‌های شناختی در سرعت نامیدن تصویر میان مردان و زنان دو زبانة فارسی-انگلیسی». فصل‌نامة جستارهای زبانی (پژوهش‌های زبان و ادبیات تطبیقی سابق). د 5. ش 2. صص 178-161.

Arévalo, L. A. (2002). "Teasing Apart Actions and Objects: A Picture Naming Study". CRL Newsletter. 14. 2. pp. 1-15.

Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by Itself. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Barry, C., C. M. Morrison & A. W. Ellis (1997). "Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 50A. pp. 560-585.

Bonin, P., M. Chalard, A. Meot & M. Fayol (2002). "The Determinants of Spoken and Written Picture Naming Latencies". British Journal of Psychology. 93. pp. 89-114.

Biran, M. & N. Friedmann (2012). "The Representation of Lexical-syntactic Information: Evidence from Syntactic and Lexical Retrieval Impairments in Aphasia. Cortex. 48. pp.1103- 1127.

Caramazza, A. (1997). "How Many Levels of Processing are there in Lexical Access?". Cognitive Neuropsychology. 14. pp.177- 208.

Caramazza, A. & M. Miozzo (1997). "The Relation between Syntactic and Phonological Knowledge in Lexical Access: Evidence from the ‘Tip-of-the-tongue’ Phenomenon". Cognition. 64(3). pp. 309-343.

Davidoff, J. & J. Masterson (1995/6). "The Development of Picture Naming: Differences between Verbs and Nouns". Neurolinguistics. 9 (2). pp. 69-83.

Dotan, D. & N. Friedmann (2007). "From Seven Dwarfs to Four Wolves: Differences in the Processing of Number Words and other Words". Language and Brain. 6. pp. 3-17.

………. (2010). "Words and Numbers in the Phonological Output Buffer". Presented at the Academy of Aphasia Meeting, Athens, Greece.

Druks, J. (2002). "Verbs and Nouns- A Review of the Literature". Journal of Neurolinguistics. 15. pp. 289-315.

Druks, J. & T. Shallice (2000). "Selective Preservation of Naming from Description and the 'Restricted Preverbal Message'". Brain and Language. 72. pp. 100-28.

Garn, C. L., M. D. Allen & J. D. Larsen (2009). "An fMRI Study of Sex Differences in Brain Activation during Object Naming". Cortex. 45. pp. 610-618.

Glaser, W. R. (1992). "Picture Naming". Cognition. 42. pp. 61–105.

Helbig, B. H., M. Graf & M. Kiefer (2006). "The Role of Action Representations in Visual Object Recognition". Exp Brain Res. 174.pp. 221-228.

Indefrey, P. & W. J. M. Levelt (2004). "The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components". Cognition. 92. pp.101–144.

Kolan, L., M. Leikin & P. Zwitserlood (2011). "Morphological Processing and Lexical Access in Speech Production in Hebrew: Evidence from Picture–word Interference". Journal of Memory and Language. 65.pp. 286-298.

Levelt, W. J. M., A. Roelofs & A.S. Meyer (1999). " Theory of Lexical Access in Speech Production". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22. pp. 1–75.

Liljeström, M., A. Tarkiainen, T. Parviainen, J. Kujala, J. Numminen, J. Hiltunen, M. Laine & R. Salmelina (2008). "Perceiving and Naming Actions and Objects". NeuroImage. 41. pp. 1132-1141.

Liljestro¨m, M., A. Hulte´n, L. Parkkonen & R. Salmelin (2009). "Comparing MEG and fMRI Views to Naming Actions and Objects". Human Brain Mapping. 30. pp.1845–1856.

Martin, A., L. L. Chao (2001). "Semantic Memory and the Brain: Structure and Processes". Neurobiology. 11. pp. 194–201.

Ma¨tziga, S., J. Druksa, J. Masterson & G. Viglioccoa (2009). "Noun and Verb Differences in Picture Naming: Past Studies and New Evidence". Cortext. 45. pp. 738-758.

Miceli, G., M. C. Silveri, U. Nocentini & A. Caramazza (1988). "Patterns of Dissociations in Comprehension and Production of Nouns and Verbs". Aphasiology. 2. pp. 351-8.

Morrison, C. M. & A. W. Ellis (2000). "Real Age of Acquisition Effects in Word Naming and Lexical Decision". British Journal of Psychology. 91. pp.167-180.

Morrison, C. M., A. W. Ellis & P. T. Quinlan (1992). "Age of Acquisition, not Word Frequency, Affects Object Naming, not Object Recognition". Memory and Cognition. 20. pp.705-714.

Morsella, E. & M. Miozzo (2002). "Evidence for a Cascade Model of Lexical Access in Speech Production". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 28. pp. 555-563.

Navarrete, E. & A. Costa (2005). "Phonological Activation of Ignored Pictures: Further Evidence for a Cascade Model of Lexical Access". Journal of Memory & Language. 53. pp. 359-377.

Plaut, D. C. & L. M. Gonnerman (2000). "Are Non-semantic Morphological Effects Incompatible with a Distributed Connectionist Approach to Lexical Processing?". Language and Cognitive Processes. 15(4/5). pp. 445–485.

Radford, A., M. Atkinson, D. Britain, H. Clahsen & A. Spenser (2008). Linguistics: An Introduction. Essex: Cambridge University Press.

Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., F. M. Damian, A. M. Pe´rez, S. J. Bowers & J. Marı´n (2009). "Name–picture Verification as a Control Measure for Object Naming: A Task Analysis and Norms for a Large Set of Pictures". The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. (62)8. pp. 1581-1597.

Vigliocco, G., J. Warren, S. Siri, J. Arciuli, S. Scott & R. Wise (2006)."The Role of Semantics and Grammatical Class in the Neural Representation of Words". Cortex. 16. pp.1790–1796.

ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)

Differences in Contribution of Lexical Processing Levels in L2 Noun and Verb Processing and their Implications in English Language Teaching

References

References

Volume 9, Issue 22
April 2017
Pages 147-162

Differences in Contribution of Lexical Processing Levels in L2 Noun and Verb Processing and their Implications in English Language Teaching

References

References

Volume 9, Issue 22April 2017Pages 147-162

Volume 9, Issue 22
April 2017
Pages 147-162