Sonority Dispersion of Two Consonant Clusters in Syllable Boundary Position in Persian

Document Type : Research

Authors

Abstract

Sonority Dispersion of Two Consonant Clusters in Syllable Boundary Position in Persian
Afshin Rahimi[1], Moharram Eslami2, Bahram Vazinezhad3
Received: 2012/10/02
Accepted: 2013/11/17
 
Abstract
This study  explories the sonority dispersion between two consonants in syllable boundary in Persian. Sonority restriction in syllable boundary demonstrates a universal tendency in falling sonority of consonants at syllable boundary. In this study, 4202 lexemes consisting of syllable structure of CVC.CVC were subject to analyses which were extracted from Persian Generative Lexicon. From the point of view of sonority, the Persian consonants have been classified in five distinct classes in which the relation of sonority scale in syllable boundary and frequency in lexemes has been investigated. Unmarkedness of a structure has direct relation with frequency both diachronically and synchronically, and the results show that falling in sonority in two cluster consonants in the boundary CVC syllables do not act categorically in Persian and do not divide the structures into two wellformed and illformed ones. The frequency of two consonant clusters in lexemes increases with decreasing of the slope of sonority from +4 to -4. Contrary to sonorant consonants which are likely to appear in offset position, non-sonorant consonants have a tendency to appear in onset position in syllable boundary. Using Pointwise Mutual Information demonstrates that co-occurrence tendency in clusters with the falling slope of sonority is not higher than rising equivalent and different sonority based consonant classes appear independently in offset and onset. Based on the above said tendency and the important role of this tendency in the structure of patterns in syllable boundary, it is more justified to describe this phonological phenomenon in the framework of auditory phonetics than describe it with phonological constraints. 
Keywords: syllable contact law, sonority, CVC syllable boundary, two consonant clusters, falling sonority, rising sonority
 



[1] Afshin Rahimi, PhD Candidate in Computer Science, University of Melbourne, arahimi@student.unimelb.edu.au
2 Moharram Eslami,  Associate Professor. of linguistics, University of Zanjan, meslami@znu.ac.ir ( correspondent author)
3 Bahram Vazirnezhad, Assistant Professor. Sharif  University of Technology, bahram@sharif.edu
 

Keywords

References

اسلامی، محرم، مسعود شریفی آتشگاه، صدیقه علیزاده لمجیری و طاهره زندی (1389). «واژگان زایای زبان فارسی».  زبان فارسی و رایانه. ج1 . به کوشش حسین صامتی و محمود بی‌جن‌خان. تهران: انتشارات سمت. صص 38-30.
Ahmadkhani, M. (2010). "Phonological Metathesis in Persian: Synchronic,
Diachronic, and the Optimality Theory". Pazhuhesh-e Zbanhay-e
Khareji. 56. Special Issue, English. Spring 2010. pp. 5-24.

Burquest, Donald A. & David L. Payne (1993). Phonological Analysis: A Functional Approach. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Clements, G. N. (1990). "The Role of the Sonority Cycle in Core Syllabification".
Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of
Speech. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 283-333.
Gouskova, M. (2004)."Relational Hierarchies in Optimality Theory: The Case of
Syllable Contact".Phonology. 21. Cambridge Univ Press. pp. 201-250.
Harris, J. (2005). "The Phonology of Being Understood: Further Arguments against
Sonority". Lingua. vol 116. Issue 10. pp 1483-1494.
Keshavarz, M. (2000). "A Sociolinguistic Analysis of ethathsis in Persian". Journal of Humanities.Winter-Spring 2000. vol. 7. No. 1. pp. 16-22.
 
Ladefoged, Peter & Keith Johnson (2011).  A Course in Phonetics. 6th edition.
Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
McGowan, K. (2008). Gradient Lexical Reflexes of Syllable Contact Law. In: <https://kbmcgowan.github.io/publications/mcgowan-cls45.pdf>
Selkrik, Elizabeth (1984). "On the Major Class Features and Syllable Theory". Language Sound Structure: Studies in Phonology Dedicated to Morris Halle by his Students. M. Aronoff and R.T. Oherle (eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. pp.107-136.
Steriade, D. (1997). Phonetics in Phonology: The case of Laryngeal Neutralization. UCLA ms.
Vennemann, T. (1988). Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation
of Sound Change: With Special Reference to German, Germanic, Italian, and
Latin. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wright, R. A. (2004). "A Review of Perceptual Cues and Cue Robustness".  Phonetically Based Phonology.  B. Hayes, R. Kirchner & D. Steriade (eds.). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 34-57.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics