A Comparative Analysis of Acronyms in Persian, English, Arabic and Turkish

Famiyan, Alireza Gholi; Sokhanvar, Maryam

doi:10.22051/jlr.2016.2148

Document Type : Research

Authors

¹ Payam Noor university

² Islamic Azad university

https://doi.org/10.22051/jlr.2016.2148

Abstract

A Comparative Analysis of Acronyms in Persian, English, Arabic and Turkish

Ali Reza Gholi Famian[1] , Maryam Sokhanvar[2]

Received: 2011/09/17
Accepted: 2014/10/20

Abstract
Acronym formation is a major word-formation process where one or a series of letter(s) substitute one word or a longer expression. In this study, we explored the structure and frequency of acronyms in four languages, i.e. Persian, English, Arabic and Turkish. First, the websites related to Islamic Republic of Iran, United States of America, Egypt, and Turkey are selected in six topics including news, politics, sports, business, science, and culture. The pages selected randomly for each language includes six thousand (60000) words, and thereby the research corpus includes twenty four thousand (240000) words. The findings show that English is top in both the number of acronyms and their frequency, Turkish is the second followed by Persian and Arabic. The study of acronyms’ internal structure reveals that more than fifty percent of acronyms have three letters. Considering alphabet and morphological typology, it is maintained that the former plays a more significant role in making and using acronyms.

Keywords: acronym, Persian, English, Arabic, Turkish

1.Assistant professor, Department of Linguistics and Foreign Languages, Payame Noor University, (Corresponding Author);famian@pnush.ac.ir

[2] .MA. General Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, Ahar Branch mary;2007am@yahoo.com

Keywords

20.1001.1.20088833.1394.7.17.5.4

References

امینی، امین (1383). هرمز چهارم: دوازده سال سلطنت، سیزده سال سکه. یزد: شرکت تبلیغاتی طلوع یزد.

تفضلی، احمد (1375). زبان پهلوی- ادبیات و دستور آن. تهران: معین.

.......... (1376). تاریخ ادبیات ایران پیش از اسلام. تهران: سخن.

شقاقی، ویدا (1389). مبانی صرف. تهران: سمت.

Al-Qinani, J. (2007). “Abbreviation and Acronymy in English Arabic Translation”. Meta:Translators’ Journal. Vol. 52. pp. 368-375.

Dannells, D. (2005). “Recognizing Swedish Acronyms and their Definitions in Biomedical Literature”. Research Report. Department of Swedish Language. Gotenborg University. Sweden.

Harley, H. (2004). “Why is the CIA But Not *The NASA? Acronyms, Initialisms, and Definite Descriptions”. American Speech. 79(4). pp.368-399.

Lewis, G. (1999). The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success. Oxford University Press.

Katamba, F. (1993). Morphology. Macmillan Press LTD.

Reza Goli Famian, A. (2008). “A Cross-Cultural Study of Acronyms in English and Persian”. The Perspectives of Linguistics in the 21^st Century. Jong Yurl Yoon & Kyoung Ae Kim (eds.). Hankook Munhwasa. pp. 471- 479.

Schwartz, A. S. & M. A. Hearst (2003). “A Simple Algorithm for Identifying Definitions in Biomedical Text”. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. 8. pp. 451-462.

Taghva, K. & J. Gilberth (1999). “Recognizing Acronyms and their Definitions”. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR).1. pp.191-198.

Yeats, S., D. Bainbridge & I. H.Witten (2000). “Using Compression to Identify Acronyms in Text”. In. Proceedings of the Conference on Data Compression.IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.USA. <http://www.sigmod.org/publications/dblp/db/conf/dcc/dcc2000.html>

Zipf, G. K. )1949(. Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge.

ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)

A Comparative Analysis of Acronyms in Persian, English, Arabic and Turkish

References

References

Volume 7, Issue 17 - Serial Number 17
March 2016
Pages 103-122

A Comparative Analysis of Acronyms in Persian, English, Arabic and Turkish

References

References

Volume 7, Issue 17 - Serial Number 17March 2016Pages 103-122

Volume 7, Issue 17 - Serial Number 17
March 2016
Pages 103-122