The Syntactic and Semantic typological study of endocentric and exocentric compound nouns in Iranian children and adolescents stories

Document Type : Research

Author

Linguistics department, Faculty of letter and humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

1- Introduction
Compounding is one of the most common and useful methods for creating new words. Investigating compound formation is a continuing concern within the field of morphology. Recent developments in the field of linguistics have led to the renewed interest in this phenomenon from different aspects such as semantics perspectives, cognitive linguistics, morphology, acoustic phononetics, neurolinguistics and sociolinguistics.
     However, far too little attention has been paid to compounding in the field of typology. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the endocentric and exocentric compound nouns in different age groups of children and adolescent stories. This research tried to answer the following questions: (1) what would be the probable syntactic prototype pattern(s) for the endocentric and exocentric compound nouns? (2) what would be the probable semantic prototype pattern(s) for the endocentric and exocentric compound nouns?, and (3) how could the difference in the ratio of their frequencies be explained?
 
2- Theoretical framework
There are various theoretical frameworks for categorizing endocentric and exocentric compound nouns, including Spencer, 1991; Fabb, 1998; Olsen, 2001; Bauer, 2001; Haspelmath, 2002; Booij, 2005; Bisetto and Scalise, 2005. Nonetheless, endocentricity and exocentricity deal with syntactic and semantic aspects of the language; therefore, to investigate the two aforementioned types of compound nouns, Shaghaghi’s framework (2008) was used. Regarding the semantic relation between the constituents, compound nous are classified as: (1) endocentric compound: it consists of two words in which one of them functions as the head, such as steamboat (the head is ), blackboard (the head is ), and (2) exocentric compound: it is a compound construction that lacks a head word: that is, the construction as a whole is not semantically equivalent to either of its parts. So the central meaning isn't carried by the head, but is external to the compound; examples include: paleface, pickpocket.
 
3- Methodology
Based on the purpose of the present study, 315 stories have been selected using convenience sampling. The stories were allocated to different age groups: group A (pre-school & primary school children) and group B (middle school and high school adolescents). To investigate the two aforementioned types of compound nouns, Shaghaghi’s framework (2008) was used. After calculating the frequency of compound nouns in stories, the two groups were compared with each other in order to reach the decision about the probable prototype pattern for endocentricity and exocentricity of Persian compound nouns.
 
4- Results and discussion
Regarding the first question of this research, the syntactic prototype patterns for endocentric and exocentric compound nouns in both groups are: N+N > N+Adj> V+ Adj. The second question addressed the issue of extracting the semantic prototype pattern of compound nouns. The results demonstrated that the most frequent type of compound in both groups was endocentric compound: group A 70.5 % and group B 52%. So, endocentric compound nouns> exocentric compound nouns. Furthermore, the results also showed that the usages of exocentric compound nouns were higher in the second group in comparison to the first group. So it seems that social and cognitive development plays a key role in using exocentric compounds. In other words, cognitive development in adolescents and their attention to details, help them to understand and process exocentric compound nouns faster and easier.
 
5- Conclusion and suggestions
The study raises questions that would require further investigation. Future research can include a kind of diachronic study; i.e. studying the described prototype patterns in past and present prose texts. The findings of the present study might be a contributing factor for Iranian authors to narrate their story according to language development in childern and the level of cognition.

Keywords

References

Abdullahi-Idiagbon, M.S., & Olaniyi, O.K. (2011). Coinages in Nigerian English: a sociolinguistic perspective. African Nebula, 1 (3), 78-85.
Ahmadi-Givi, H., & Anvari, H. (1999). Persian grammar. Tehran: Fatemi publication [in Persian].
Alavi Moghaddam, B., & kheirabadi, M. (2014). The study of core vocabulary in children´s stories and poems of “Roshde Noamuz” magazine. Language Query, 5 (2), 139- 160 [in Persian].
Bauer, L. (2001). Compounding. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals (pp.695-707). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Bauer, L. (2011). Typology of compounds. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding (pp. 343-356). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benczes, R. (2015). Are exocentric compounds really exocentric?. SKASE Journal of Theorretical Linguistics. 12 (3), 54-73.
Bisetto, A., & Scalise, S. (2005). Classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio. 2, 319- 332.
Bömerová, A. (2014). Recent word-formation tendencies in English and their cross-linguistic impact: contemporary issues on linguistic and language. LILA 14 Linguistics and Language Conference Proceedings. 63-75.
Booij, G. (2005). The Grammar of words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Childers, J. B., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Are nouns easier to learn than verbs? three experimental studies. In K. A. Hirsh-Pasek & Roberta M. Golinkoff, Action Meets Word: How children learn verbs (pp. 1-36). Oxford Scholarship Online: OUP.
Clahsen, H &  Almazan, M. (2001). Compounding and inflection in language impairment: evidence from Williams Syndrome (and SLI). Lingua. 111 (10), 729-757.
Clark, E. V. (1983). Meanings and concepts. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (4nd ed., pp. 787-840(. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Clark, E. V. (2003). First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fabb, N. (1998). Compounding. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), The Handbook of Morphology (pp. 66-83). Oxford: Blakwell.
Gaeta, L. (2008). Constituent order in compounds and syntax: typology and diachrony. Morphology, 18,117–141.
Guevara, E. & Scalise, S. (2009). Searching for universals in compounding. In S. Scalise., S. E. Magni & A. Bisetto (Eds.). Universals of Language Today (pp. 101-129). Berlin: Springer.
Haspelmath, M. (2001). Language typology and language universals: an international handbook. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.
Heyvaert, L. (2009). Compounding and cognitive linguistics. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 201–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Jackendoff, R. (2012). Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. Typology of compounds. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding(pp. 178-191 ). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kalbasi, I. (1992). The derivational structure of word in modern Persian. Tehran: Institute for humanities and cultural [in Persian]. 
KarimiDoustan, Gh., & Vahid, A. (2013). A semantic analysis of noun-noun compounds in Persian. Linguistic Research, 5 (8), 65-82 [in Persian].
Kersten, A., & Smith, L. (2002). Attention to novel objects during verb learning. Child Development. 73 (1), 93-109.
Khanlari, P. (2007). Persian grammar (21nd ed). Tehran: Tous publication. [in Persian].
Kluger, J. (2013). Who needs nouns? how toddlers learn to speak. Time magazine.
         [Online]: <http://science.time.com/2013/10/01/who-needs-nouns-how-toddlers-learn-to-speak/>
Korzen, I. (2016). Exocentric and endocentric verb typology: Talmy revisited- on good grounds. Language and Cognition. 8 (2), 206-236.
Kuperman, V., Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, H. (2007). Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds. The Journal of Acousitcal Society of America. 121(4), 2261-71. 
Libben, G. (2006). Why study compound processing? an overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The Representation and Processing of Compound Words (pp. 1-22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lieber, R. (2012). A lexical semantic approach to compounding. typology of compounds. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding (pp. 78-104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McGregor, K. K., Rost, G. C., Yu Guo, L., & Sheng, L. (2010). What compound words mean to children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguist, 31(3): 463–487.
Miller, J. F. & Leddy, M. )1999(. Verbal fluency, speech intelligibility, and communicative effectiveness. In: J. F. Miller., M. Leddy & A. Leavitt )Eds.), Improving the communication of people with down syndrome (pp. 81-91). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing.
Murphy, G. L. (1988). Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science, 12, 529-562.
Nakov, P. (2013). On the interpretation of noun compounds: syntax, semantics, entailment. Natural Language Engineering, 1 (1), 1–40.
Olsen, S. (2001). Copulative compounds: a closer look at the distinction between morphology and syntax. In G. Booij, & J. V. Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology (pp. 279-320). Dordrecht: Foris.
Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ralli, A. & Andreou, M. (2012). Revisiting exocentricity in compounding: evidence from Greek and Cypriot. In F. Kiefer, M. Ladányi & P. Siptár (Eds.), Current Issues in Morphological Theory. (Ir)regularity, analogy and Frequency (pp. 65-81). Amsterdam- Philadelphia: John Benjamins publishing Co.
Sabzevari, M. (2012). Analysis and explanation of semantic relations in exocentric compounds in modern Persian. Journal of a Critical Study of Literature and Humanities Programs, 12 (1), 61-45. [in Persian].
Scalise, S., A. Fabrigas, A. & Forza, F. (2009). Exocentricity in compounding. Gengo Kenkyu. 135, 49–84.
Shaghaghi, V. (2007). An introduction to morphology. Tehran: SAMT [in Persian].
Spencer, A. (1991). Morphological theory: an introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Wiley: Blackwell.
Tabatabaee, A. (2012).  A typological comparison between noun compounds in Persian and    English. Comparative Linguistics, 2 (3), 2-17 [in Persian].
Tomasello, M. (2002). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition. 74 (3), 209-53.
ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)
Volume 10, Issue 29
February 2019
Pages 461-81

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics