ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

Zabanpazhuhi

Author Index

Keyword Index

News

Journal Metrics

Publication Ethics

Editorial Board

Aims and Scope

Indexing and Abstracting

FAQ

Related Links

About Journal

Peer Review Process

Executive staff

Subject Areas

Guide for Authors

Editing English articles

Conflict of interest of the author

Commitment

Publons Registration Guide

Reviewers Journal in 1999

Reviewers 2020

List of 2021 Reviewers2021

List of 2021 Reviewers 2022

Reviewers Journal 2023

The Role of Some Individual Differences in Metaphorical Comprehension of Time in Persian: A Cognitive Approach

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 Ph.D. candidate in Department of Linguistics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran, Zahedan

2 Associate Professor in Department of Linguistics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran, Zahedan

3 Assistant Professor in Department of Linguistics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran, Zahedan

4 Associate Professor in Department of Phycology, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran, Zahedan

Abstract

One of the most fundamental and vague human experiences that forms part of the complexity and richness of language is the "time". Time alone cannot be understood and experienced. Therefore, it is understood and experienced in the context of the "space". When thinking or talking about time, this is often done through two perspectives:  Moving Ego Metaphor and Moving Time Metaphor. From the Moving Ego perspective, time is constant and the observer moves towards time. But in Moving Time perspective, time is understood as moving, and the observer is constant. The people's perspective of time is determined by vague questions. Various researches have shown that some differences between individuals may influence the choice of a person's time perspective. The purpose of this research is to investigate the role of some individual differences in the metaphorical comprehension of time in Persian. These differences include lifestyle differences (students versus university staff), procrastination, conscientiousness and extroversion. In this regard, the present study seeks to answer the following questions:
1- Is there any significant difference between Persian-speaking staff and university students in the metaphorical comprehension of the time statement of the next Wednesday's meeting?
2- Does the procrastination and conscientiousness of people affect the metaphorical comprehension of the time statement of the next Wednesday's meeting in Persian language?
3- Does the extroversion of people affect the metaphorical comprehension of the time statement of the next Wednesday's meeting in Persian language?

Keywords

References
  1. Afrashi, A. (2013). Linguistic perception and representation the concept of time: Cognitive analysis. Presented at Second National Conference on Persian Language Education and Linguistics, 15 May. Shiraz, Research Sciences Azad University. [In Persian]
  2. Boroditsky, Lera. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1), 1–28.
  3. Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–188.
  4. Boroditsky, L. (2011). How languages construct time. In S. Dehaene and E. Brannon (Eds.), Space Time Number
    in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought (pp.
    333–341. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press
  5. Clark, H. H. 1973. Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York, NY: Academic Press
  6. Duffy, S. & Feist, M. (2014). Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(1), 29-54.
  7. Duffy, S. E., Feist, M. I., & McCarthy, S. (2014). Moving through time: The role of personality in three real‐life contexts. Cognitive science, 38(8), 1662-1674.
  8. Evans, V. (2004). The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning, and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  9. Evans, V. (2013). Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  10. Eysenck, H. J. (1953). The Science Study of Personality: A Note on the Review. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 6(1), 44-52.
  11. Fischer, C. (2001). Read this paper later: Procrastination with time-consistent preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46(3), 249-269.
  12. Evans, V., & Green, E. M (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
  13. Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space→ time metaphors. Language and cognitive processes, 17(5), 537-565.
  14. Giambra, L. M., Quilter, R. E., & Phillips, P. B. (1988). The relationship of age and extraversion to arousal and performance on a sustained attention task: A cross-sectional investigation using the Mackworth clock-test. Personality and individual differences, 9(2), 225-230.
  15. Golfam, A., Kurdzaferanlu Kambozia, A., & Hassan Dukht, S. (2009). Cognitive study of time metaphor in Forough Farrokhzad's poems. Literary Criticism, 2(7), 121-136 [In Persian]
  16. Grunschel, C., Patrzek, J., & Fries, S. (2013). Exploring different types of academic delayers: A latent profile analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 225-233.
  17. Haspelmath, M. (1997). From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world's languages. Munich: Lincom
  18. Hauser, D. J., Margaret, S., Carter & Brian, P. M. (2009). Mellow Monday and furious Friday: The approach-related link between anger and time representation. Cognition and Emotion, 23(6), 1166–1180.
  19. Henning, J. B., Stufft, C. J., Payne, S. C., Bergman, M. E., Mannan, M. S., & Keren, N. (2009). The influence of individual differences on organizational safety attitudes. Safety science, 47(3), 337-345.
  20. Jahangiri, N & Noorbakhsh, S. (2016). Representing future conceptualization in Persian utterances in the framework of default semantics. Journal of Language Research, 8(21), 32-61. [In Persian]
  21. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy. Handbook of personality: Theory and Research, 3(2), 114-158.
  22. Kafipour R., Khojasteh L., Moslehi Sh. (2020). The Impact of Motivation, Learning Strategies, And Personality Trait on Medical Students’ Procrastination in English Courses. Sadra Medical Science Journal. 8 (3), 233-248 [In Persian].  
  23. Kranjec, Ar. (2006). Extending spatial frames of reference to temporal concepts. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 447–452). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  24. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  25. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  26. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books
  27. Levine, R. (1997). A Geography of Time: The Temporal Misadventures of a Social Psychologist, or how every Culture keeps Time just a little bit differently. New York: Basic Books
  28. Li, H., & Cao, Y. (2019). Planning for the future: The relationship between conscientiousness, temporal focus and implicit space-time mappings. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 111-116.
  29. Mansoory, Bahareh. (2016). The Acquisition of Spatial Metaphors of time in Persian Speaking Children (Unpublished PhD thesis). Institute for Humanities & Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran [In Persian]
  30. Margolies, S. O., & Crawford, L. E. (2008). Event valence and spatial metaphors of time. Cognition and Emotion, 22(7), 1401-1414.
  31. Matlock, T, Michael, R & Lera, B. (2005). On the experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science, 29, 655–664.
  32. Matlock, T, Keven J. H, Mahesh, S & Michael, R. (2011). Even abstract motion influences the understanding of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 260–271.
  33. McGlone, M. S., & Harding, J. L. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1211–1223.
  34. Milgram, N., & Tenne, R. (2000). Personality correlates of decisional and task avoidant procrastination. European Journal of Personality, 14(2), 141-156.
  35. Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
  36. Milgram, N. N., Mey-Tal, G., & Levison, Y. (1998). Procrastination, generalized or specific, in college students and their parents. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 297-316.
  37. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
  38. Costa, Paul T.; McCrae, Robert R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources
  39. Moore, K. (2000). Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Wolof: Point of view, conceptual mapping, and linguistic practice. Retrieved from <https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7s4628f2>.
  40. Moore, K. E. (2006). Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 199-244.
  41. Nasib Zarraby, F., & Pahlavannezhad, M. (2014). Model for the concept of time in Persian speakers’ minds: based on metaphoric gestures. Journal of Language Researches, 5 (1), 109-127. [In Persian].
  42. Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401-450.
  43. Núñez, R., Motz, B., & Teuscher, U. (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego- and time reference point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 133–146.
  44. Ramscar, M. (2010). Computing machinery and understanding. Cognitive science, 34(6), 966-971.
  45. Revelle, W., Humphreys, M. S., Simon, L., & Gilliland, K. (1980). The interactive effect of personality, time of day, and caffeine: A test of the arousal model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109 (1), 1-31.
  46. Richmond, J., Clare Wilson, J., & Zinken, J. (2012). A feeling for the future: How does agency in time metaphors relate to feelings?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(7), 813-823.
  47. Ruscher, J. B. (2011). Moving forward: The effect of spatiotemporal metaphors on perceptions of grief. Social Psychology, 42(3), 225–230.
  48. Schouwenburg, H. C., & Lay, C. H. (1995). Trait procrastination and the big-five factors of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(4), 481-490.
  49. Schraw, G., Wadkins, T., & Olafson, L. (2007). Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 12.
  50. Zheng, W., Liu, Y., Liu, C. H., Chen, Y. H., Cui, Q., & Fu, X. (2019). The Influence of Event Valence and Emotional States on the Metaphorical Comprehension of Time. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. 410, 1-13.
  51. Yussefi Rad, F. (2003). The study of metaphor of time in Persian: A cognitive semantic approach (Unpublished Master thesis). Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran [In Persian].
ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)
Volume 14, Issue 43 - Serial Number 43
July 2022
Pages 213-243
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics