Lexical binaries in Ferdowsi’s Shahname and their use in teaching Farsi

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 PhD. in Persian Language & Literature, Persian Language & Literature Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

2 Professor of Department of Persian Language and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

3 Professor of Department of English Language and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

4 Assistant Professor of Department of Persian Language and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

The significance of teaching language has motivated various studies in which many procedures have been suggested like applying literature in language teaching. Most of these studies have focused on cultural issues and the direct use or rewriting of literary texts. Yet, this study aimed to use the language framework applied in these texts to produce educational material. The concern of this study was to observe which literary text could provide a suitable pattern for language teaching and what features they should have to ease the learning process. The authenticity and comprehensibility are the first factors suggested. Accordingly, Ferdowsi’s Shahname was selected for analysis as its authenticity and validity and its effective role in maintaining Farsi. In comparison to other texts, it is much older and its language is still comprehensible. Also, it seems that by investigating lexical combinations in Shahname, the way it preserves the lexis can be shown. This descriptive-analytic investigation of lexical relations in the statistical sample shows about 40% of the lexes have dual combinations, half of which are excluded from the general description of collocations. Therefore, the phrase “binary lexes” was suggested here. Additionally, about 70% of binary combinations are meaningful types, this means that the reader is dealing with a great number of binary lexes in the text and reader has tried to understand the words and content by activating his former knowledge about lexes. This feature can help design educational material for language teaching.
New perspectives and attitudes toward teaching language and its skills have led to the proposal of new challenges and approaches. Using literature in language teaching is just one of these approaches and based on this theory, literary language with all its special features attracts learners in addition to providing the cultural background of the language, it helps the learner understand language on multiple semantic levels while it also increases their linguistic awareness, which in turn increases their language proficiency and ability in interpreting sentences (Lazar, 1993).
Various studies have been conducted on the use of literature in teaching Farsi, which often focuses on the function of literature in transmitting cultural matters, however, some have also examined the impact of literature on enhancing the learners’ language understanding and proficiency. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of literature as context and framework for teaching educational content, which has been the focus of few studies based on the researchers’ knowledge.
For this matter, it was required to refer to authentic and reliable texts whose language was also meaningful for the audience (Mishan, 2005; Tomlinson, 2011). With this hypothesis that Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh has had a unique role in the survival and enhancement of Farsi, and it also holds an active, reliable and authentic language, in this study we tried to investigate one of its linguistic features in language teaching. As learning vocabulary is a significant step in all major approaches (Bottom-up approach, Top-down approach, Interactive approach) in language teaching and various solutions have been suggested to ease the process (like lexical network, collocations), it seems that investigating lexical relations in Shahnameh could also be a good framework and contribute to designing educational material.
For this purpose, after reviewing the related studies and background as well as recognizing the theoretical foundations, parts of the Shahnameh (Volume 1 through 5) were selected randomly. In the descriptive-analytical method, the lexical relations of meaning (reckoning, confrontation, contradiction, proportion and association), structural (spatial and syntactic), and phonetic in all terms were extracted and categorized. The reliability of the data was verified by a group of graduates and PhD students in the Persian language and literature.
Results showed that lexical relations in Shahnameh show that there is a dual link (beyond the definition of the collocation) in a vast volume of text (nearly half of it), which along with other lexical relations places almost the whole text within a network as there are no words left aside without having any connection with other words. This feature makes the language of the text available and understandable to the reader. The authors proposed the term “lexical binaries” and believe that this feature could be used to develop Persian language teaching resources and to facilitate the learning of learners.

Keywords

References


References
Alderson, J. C. (2005). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading: issues and strategies. Canada: Heinle.
Ebrahimi, Sh. (2012). The linguistic analysis of lexical collocations in Masnavi Manavi by Maulana. (Master's Thesis). Iran, Mashhad, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad [In Persian].
Ferdowsi, A. (2009). Shahnameh. Vol. 1-5. Khaleghi Motlagh, Jalal. Second print. Tehran: The Center of the Grate Islamic Encyclopaedia [In Persian].
Field, J. (2002). Psycholinguistics: A resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
Firth, J. R. (1957). Modes of Meaning. In J.R. Firth (Ed.), Papers in linguistics (pp. 190-215). London: Oxford University Press.
Foroughi, M. A. (1983). Ferdowsi's Position & the Importance of Shahnameh. In I M. Mohagheg (Ed.), Article collection of Ferdowsi millennium (pp. 27-41). Tehran: Donya-ie-Ketab. [In Persian].
Ghazanfari, Moghaddam, S. (2019). Lexical binaries Function in Improving reading & comprehension skill. Paper presented at third international Conference of Teaching Persian Language & Literature. 30-31 January. Tarbiat Modares [In Persian].
Goodman, K. (1970). Reading: A Psycholinguistic Guessing Game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6,126-135.
Gough, P.B. (1972). One Second of Reading. In J. F. Kavanagh, & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear & by eye (pp. 331-358). Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.
Halliday M., and Hassan. R. (1992). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Jackson, H. (1988). Words and Their Meaning. London and New York: Longman.
Kazzazy, M. (2008). Shahnameh: Iranian culture & behavior letter. In B. Namvar Motlaq. The Myth's Text the Identity maker. (pp. 1-14). Tehran: Elmi-Frhangi [In Persian].
Khatami, A. (2008). Impact and influence of Shahnameh in the field of language and literature. In B. Namvar Motlaq (eds.), The Myth's Text the Identity maker (pp. 15-51). Tehran: Elmi-Frhangi [In Persian].
Koda, k. (2005). Insights into Second Language Reading: A Cross-Linguistic Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. (2003). Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Laufer, B. Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 22 (1), 1-26.
Lazar, G. (2001). Literature & Teaching Language. (M. Ghazanfaree., Trans.). Tehran: SAMT [In Persian].
Mishan, F. (2005). Designing Authenticity into Language Learning Materials. Bristol: Intellect.
Namvar Motlagh, B. (2008). An Introduction to Expanding Hypertextuality of Shahnameh. In B. Namvar Motlaq (Ed.), The Myth's Text the Identity maker (pp. 53-78). Tehran: Elmi-Frhangi [In Persian].
Nation, P. (2008). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York: Rutledge.
Nattinger, J. R. & Decario, J. S. (1992). Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: oxford University Press.
Nowroozi Kheyabani, M. (1999). Sources of collocational clashes. Literary Text Research. 4 (7 & 8), 1-11 [In Persian].
Panahi, S. (2002). The Process of Collocation & Collocation Compounds in Persian Language. Letter of the Persian Academy, 5 (3), 199-211 [In Persian].
Raghibdust, Sh., & Jadiri Jamshidi, R. (2013). The effects of teaching lexical networks on reading comprehension of foreign Persian language learners. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages. 1, 135-161 [In Persian].
Ryazi, Abdolmahdi. Mihankhah, F. (2004). Lexical collocation in Persian language. Journal of Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. 15, 88-104 [In Persian].
Safa, Z. (1991). A word about Shahnameh. In A. Dehbashi. Article collection of Ferdowsi & shahnameh (pp. 297-309). Tehran: Modabber [In Persian].
Safavi, K. (2003). A Survey of Lexical collocation in Persian Language. Jurnal of Language & Litrature, 7 (18), 1-13 [In Persian].
Sahraei, R. M., & Ahmadi, Sh. (2016). Direct teaching of vocabulary in context: the comparison of effect of direct and indirect teaching in learning vocabulary. Journal of language research. 10 (17), 77-99 [In Persian].
Sharifi, Sh., & Namvar Faragi, M. (2012). New Division of Lexical collocations with considering contextual characters in collocation's formation. Journal of linguistics & Khorasan dialects. 7, 39-62 [In Persian].
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials Development for language learning and teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wigand, H. E. (1998). Dictionary research. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Yahaghi, M. J. (2015). Under This Tall Palm: Articles on Audience Recognition of Shahnameh. Tehran: Sokhan [In Persian].
Zarei, F., Moosavi, S. K., & Maddadi, Gh. (2013). Subtleties of semantic links in Shahnameh. Bahari-Adab. 21, 454- 474 [In Persian].
ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)
Volume 13, Issue 39
July 2021
Pages 117-145

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics