A Cognitive Analysis of the Concepts of “Divine Anger and worldly Punishment” in the Holy Quran

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 PhD in Linguistics, Associate Professor, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

2 Postdoctoral Researcher in Quranic and Hadith Sciences, Al-Zahra University

3 PhD in linguistics, Tehran University

Abstract

There are many verses in the Holy Qur'an that are related to God’s wrath toward man. The frequency of these verses which are presented in different grammatical forms and meanings implies the importance of this divine message which is to be transferred to the human. Undoubtedly, God’s wrath is quite different from human anger in nature. However, a man knows the concepts that he has experienced himself and this includes emotions like anger. According to cognitive linguists, metaphor is a way of converting abstract concepts (namely the source domains) to concrete concepts (namely the target domains). This study seeks to answer the following questions:1.How does the concept of divine anger is conceptualized in the Holy Quran?  2.What are the target domains? 3.What are the differences between the prototype scenario in God and a man?
The theoretical framework used in this study is Kovecses’s (1986) theory of human anger. His model includes a list of source domains that are mapped onto the target domain of anger as well as the scenario of anger. The source domains are: A) “anger is fire/heat” as the central metaphor. The major metaphors are: B) Anger is insanity. C) Anger is a dangerous animal. D) Anger is an opponent (in a struggle). E) Anger is a burden.
F) Anger is trespassing. More metaphors are “existence are pressure” and “body is the container of feeling”. The scenario of anger which is called “prototype scenario” include the following stages:an offending event, anger, control, loss of control, an act of retribution.                                                                                        
Cognitive linguistics was introduced by the publication of the book “Metaphors We Live by” by Lakoff and Johnson in the '80s. This approach made fundamental changes in the study and analysis of metaphor that has remained unchanged since Aristotle. The new approach quickly replaced the classic one and it soon attracted many researchers. The term ‘conceptual metaphor’ is well known among Iranian researchers and a significant number of works can be found in this area. As an illustration, Hooshagi & Seyfiporgu (2009) studied the most frequent source domains in the Holy Quran and listed them. Ghaeminiya (2009) also analyzes the conceptual metaphors used in the Holy Quran, believing that cognitive theory has an impact on understanding the Qur'anic verses. Pourebrahim (2009) lists the types of conceptual metaphors in the first half of the Qur'an (15 parts).Veysi & Ouraki (2015) analyze metaphorical structures in the holy Quran. They believe that the cognitive approach is capable of analyzing verbal metaphors.  Finally, Andalibi (2006) focuses on the meta-metaphor of " Man as the Servant of God" and studies the relationship between ‘God’ and ‘Man’ in the metaphoric terms.                               
The present study is qualitative and descriptive-analytic research. To investigate how the concept of anger is conceptualized in the Holy Quran, the verses in which the concept of anger was expressed metaphorically were first extracted and then were examined regarding the source domains as well as the prototype scenario. Our aim was to identify the familiar and understandable concepts ( to man) which are used in the Quran.
The target domains were found in the conceptualization of divine anger in Qur'an were: fire, damage and destruction (disease, natural disaster, and destruction), animals, space (excommunication, damn and sealing the heart) and darkness. The target domains used in Qur'an show that although divine anger is quite different from human anger, conceptualization is done in a way that makes it easy and understandable for the human beings. Moreover, the stages of anger for  God are different from the stages of anger in man. The divine scenario of anger consists of the following three stages: ‘Guidance’ is the first stage in which God shows the right path to the people through the prophets and the Holy Scriptures. ‘Warning’ is the next step. In the Holy Quran, there are many verses that prohibit man from committing certain sins, such as disbelief and lies. The last stage is divine retribution in which God prescribes definite retributions for the sinners.

Keywords

References

References
Amini, A. (2018). The study of the conceptual metaphors of the ‘Day of Judgment’ in the Holy Quran (PhD dissertation). Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran [In Persian].
Andalibi, A. (2006). ‘Abd’ (slave); Focal metaphor in anthropology of Qur’an. Philosophy of religion (Nameh- I Hikmat), 7, 129-144 [In Persian].
Ellahi Ghomshei, M. (2009) The holy Qur’an: Revealing verses (M. B. Behbudi, Trans.) Tehran: Iran [In Persian].
Ghaemi, M. & Zolfaghari, A. (2016). The study of conceptual metaphors of ‘death’, ‘wordly life’ and ‘hereafter life’ in Qur’an. Linguistic Research in the Holy Qur’an, 5 (1), 1-20 [In Persian].
Ghaeminya, A. (2009). The role of conceptual metaphor in religious knowledge. Ghabasat, 14, 159-184 [In Persian].
Gheraati. M. (1995). Interpretation of the light. Vol. 1. Tehran: Center of Lessons from Qur’an [In Persian].
Ghorashi, A. (1992), Qur’an Dictionary. (6nd ed.). Tehran: Al-Maktab Eslamiye [In Persian].
Hamedi Shirvan, Z. & Sharifi, Sh. (2015). The cognitive study of metaphorical model of anger in the 5 selected stories of Shahnameh. In F.Qhaemi, (Ed.), Selection of Ferdowsi and Shahnameh language and literature (pp. 109-133). Ferowsi University of Mashad [In Persian].
Hejazi, B. (2016). Conceptual metaphor of ‘light’ in Qur’an. Literary Art, 3 (16), 85-102 [In Persian].
Hooshangi, H. & Seyfi Porgu, M. (2009). Conceptual metaphors from cognitive perspective. Journal of Science and Education of the Holy Qur’an, 1(3), 9-34 [In Persian].
Hosseyni, M. & Ghaemi Niya, A. (2012). Conceptual metaphor of God’s mercy (Rahmat) in the holy Qur’an. Zehn, 18 (69), 28-52 [In Persian].
Ibn Babuyeh (Sheykh Sodugh), M. (1992), The meanings of Al-Akhbar (1nd ed.), Qom: Islamic Publication for the Society of Teachers [In Arabic].
Javadi Amouli, A. (2009a), Divine philosophy from Imam Reza’s (AS) perspective (1nd ed.). Qom: Esra [In Persian].
Javadi Amouli, A. (2009b). Tansim interpretation (8nd ed.), Qom: Esra [In Persian].
Kalantari, E., Mohammadi Nia, M. & Akbarizadeh, M. (2019). A study of the conceptual metaphors of anger in the Holy Quran based on two theories of neuro-biology and conceptual act. Journal of Language Research. Online published from 28 August 2019. doi: 10.22051/JLR.2019.25458.1681 [In Persian].
Koleyni, M. (1996), Al-Kafi, Tehran: Dar al-Maktan Eslamiye [In Persian].
Kordzaaafaranhu K A. & Hajyan, Kh. (2009). Orientational metaphors in Qur’an within cognitive perspective. Literary Criticism, 3 (9), 115-139 [In Persian].
Kordzaaafaranhu K A., Poursina, M., & Nosrati, Sh. (2016). Conceptualization of the God’s words in the Qur'an regarding communication and conceptual metaphor. Zehn, 68, 5-29 [In Persian].
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (1986), Metaphors of anger, pride, and love: A lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kövecses, Z. (1995), Anger: its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross- cultural evidence, In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World (181-196). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Lakoff, G. (1992). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and thought. Ortony. A(Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors we live by,.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Makarem Shirazi, N. (1998). The holy Qur’an: text, translation & commentary. Tehran: Dar Al-Maktab Al-Eslamiye [In Persian].
Mansuri, Kh. (2015), Causes and effects of anger in God from the perspective of Qur’an. Retrieved from <http://www.matquran.com> [In Persian].
Marefat, M. H. (2002), Qur’anic sciences (4nd ed.). Qom: Al-Tamhid [In Arabic].
Meshkati, M., & Fatemizadeh, R. (2014). Eternal torture; how and why “regarding Allameh Majlesi’s and Allameh Tabatabaee’s views”. Journal of Islamic Denomination, 1(1), 83-107 [In Persian].
Morsali, N., Mohtadi, H., & Far’e Shirazi, H. (2019). A semantic analysis of the word Azaab in the Holy Quran. Journal of Literary and Quranic Research, 6 (3), 155-185 [In Persian].
Moulavi, A., Karimi doostan, Gh. & Bijankhah, M. (2015). A corpus-based approach to the study of metaphor: Focusing on anger. Journal of Linguistic Research, 6(1), 9-18 [In Persian].
Nazari, R., & Mousavi, S. M. (2020). Cognitive investigation of conceptual domains of metaphors of time nouns in the holy Quran. Linguistic Research in the Holy Quran, 9 (1), 33-48 [In Persian].
Pour Ebrahim, Sh. (2009). The Linguistic study metaphor in Qur’an (PhD dissertation). Tarbiyat Modarres Unversity, Tehran, Iran [In Persian].
Pour Ebrahim, Sh. (2014). The conceptualizations of life in Qur’anic language. Journal of Language Research, 6 (11), 63-83 [In Persian].
Pour Ebrahim, Sh., & Golfam, A., Aqhagolzadeh, F. and Zafaranlu, K. A. (2014). The study of formal metaphor in the language of the holy Qur’an. The Quarterly Journal of Lesān-E Mobeen, 4 (9), 1-18 [In Persian].
Ragheb Esfahani, H. (1995), Vocabularies of Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al-Jalil [In Arabic].
Rezaee, Gh., & Hosseyni, S. P. (2012). Artistic imaginary in Qur’an; relying on similie, metaphor and irony. Arabic Litrature Bulletin, 3(16/61), 143-165 [In Persian].
Ryding, K. C. (2005). A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saleh, A. (2013). Semantics of Qur’anic words (dictionary of Qur’anic terms). (S. H. Hosseyni, Trans.). Mashad: Astan Qhods Razavi Publication Company [In Persian].
Sasani, F. & Malakyan, M. (2014). Conceptualization of ‘anger’ in Persian. Journal of Researches in Linguistics, 2(11), 37-56 [In Persian].
Sharifi moghadam, A., & Fatemi, F. (2020). Verbal and nonverbal metaphorical conceptualization of anger in the wars of Haft Khan of Rostam. Journal of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies, 11(21), 183-214 [In Persian].
Sharifi moghadam, A., & Nazari, S. (2018). A comparative study of the function of animals in the Holy Qur’an and the Bible “focusing on signification and theme”. A Quarterly Journal of Religions. 9 (4),20-41[In Persian].
Tabatabaee, S. M. (1996), Moderation in interpretation of Qur’an. Qom: Islamic Publication for the Society of Teachers [In Arabic].
Ellahi Ghomshei, M. (2009). قرآن کریم [The Holy Qur’an]. Qom: Osveh [In Persian].
Veysi, A.,& Oraki, Gh. (2015). Structural analysis of Qur’an based on contemporary theory of metaphor. Linguistic Qur’anic Researches, 3(1), 79-101 [In Persian].
وب‌گاه
http://www.parsquran.com
ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)
Volume 13, Issue 38
May 2021
Pages 99-125

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics