ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

Zabanpazhuhi

Author Index

Keyword Index

News

Journal Metrics

Publication Ethics

Editorial Board

Aims and Scope

Indexing and Abstracting

FAQ

Related Links

About Journal

Peer Review Process

Executive staff

Subject Areas

Guide for Authors

Editing English articles

Conflict of interest of the author

Commitment

Publons Registration Guide

Reviewers Journal in 1999

Reviewers 2020

List of 2021 Reviewers2021

List of 2021 Reviewers 2022

Reviewers Journal 2023

A Pragmatic Analysis of Co-occurrence of Discourse Markers in texts: Pragmaticalization of Fuunctions

Document Type : Research

Author

Assistant professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Arak University, Arak, Iran

Abstract

In production and interpretation of discourse, interlucutors apply discourse markers (DMs) to establish and discover the relationship between discourse units (Crible & Dagand, 2019; Mohammadi & Radjaee, 2020; Schiffrin, 1987). DMs offer metadiscoursive instructions for the interpretation of discourse by the audience. This interactive process is activated through different types of metacommunicative knowledges and skills. Part of this experience embraces knowledge of text to employ grammatical and lexical elements to convey meaning. More important aspect of this faculty is related to metalanguage involving the capability to communicate different individual and social characteristics, to utilize language to communicate feelings, thoughts, and negotiate meaning (Maschler & Schiffrin, 2015). The analysis of DMs co-occurrences and combinations as a metadiscursive strategy can help researchers to predict specific possible patterns of DMs’ categorizations and such empirical and pragmatic findings will build up some foundations for future typological exploration as well as for the theorization of DM co-occurrences and collocations in general (Kassaei & Amouzadeh, 2020). Moreover, research in the area of language fluency has substantiated the positive influence of DMs investigation and analysis on second language acquisition and opens new horizons towards cognitive processes of discourse production and comprehension (Crible & Dagand,2019; Crible & Pascal, 2020). Based on DMs’ combinations sensitivity to contextual variables in real life situations, they develop novel interactive pragmatic strategies in communication in terms of emphasis, fluency of communication, and intimacy among the interlocutors (Jucker & Ziv, 1998). Consequently, the present researcher tried to investigate and compare the uses and pragmatic functions of co-occurrences of DMs in Arabic, English, and Persian texts.

Keywords

References
  1. Ahmadi, R. (2018). A Study of Discourse Markers in Quoranic Texts (Master's Term Project). Arak University, Arak, Iran
  2. Aijmir, K. (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: Johan Benjamins
  3. Aysu, S. (2017). The use of discourse markers in the writing of Turkish students. Journal of Higher Education and Sciences, 7(1), 132-138
  4. Boojari, S. (2019). A Comparative Study of the Frequency and Polyfunctionality of Discourse Markers used in A Simple Favor by the American Author Darcey Bell and Betrayal by the British Author Martina Cole: with Pedagogical Implications, (Unpublished Master Thesis), Arak University, Arak, Iran
  5. Bordería, S. (2018). The combination of discourse markers in spontaneous conversations. International Journal of Romance Languages, 53 (1), 121-158
  6. Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic Markers in English: grammaticalization and discourse functions. New York: Mounto de Gruyter
  7. Brinton, L., J. (2015). Historical Discourse Analysis, In N. Tanen, T. Hamilton, and D. Schiffrin. (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, (pp. 222-242) Oxford: Blackwell  
  8. Castro, C., M. (2009). The use and functions of discourse markers in EFL classroom interaction. Profile, 11, 57-77
  9. Crible, L., & Degand, L. (2019). Domains and functions: a two-dimensional account of discourse markers. Discours, 4(5),15-30
  10. Crible, L., & Pascual, E. (2020). Combinations of discourse markers with repairs and repetitions in English, French and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 5(7), 54-67
  11. Cuenca, M., & Crible, L.  (2019). Co-occurrence of discourse markers in English: From juxtaposition to composition. Journal of Pragmatics, 140(5), 171-184
  12. Cuenca, M. J. & Marin, M. J. (2009). Co-occurence of discourse markers in Catalan and Spanish oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 899-914
  13. Dagand, L. & Cuenca, M. J. (2019). Discourse Marker use: from production to comprehension. Retriever from: <http://www.sle2020.eu/downloads/workshops.>
  14. Dehghan, R. (2020). An Analysis of the Application of Discourse Markers in Translation Criticism (Research Project). Arak University, Arak, Iran
  15. Faghih Malek Marzban, N. (2008). The Functions of Conjunctions. Faslnameh ElmiPazhuheshi olum Ensani, 4(6), 145-168 [In Persian].
  16. Farghal, M. & Samateh, A. (2017). Explicitation vs Implicitation: Disvourse Markers in Translation. Al-Balaqa for Research and Studies, 19(2), 27-49
  17. Fisher, K. (2006). Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amstersam: Elsevier
  18. Frank-Job, B. (2006). A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 359-375). Oxford: Elsevier
  19. Fraser, B. (2006). Towards a theory of discourse markers. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 240-256). Oxford: Elsevier.
  20. Fraser, B. (2013). Combinations of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English. Journal of Pragmatics 30(7), 112-121
  21. Fraser, B. (2015). The combining of Discourse Markers – A beginning. Journal of Pragmatics 86(7), 123-138
  22. Gandomkar, L. (2018). A Comparative Study of the Frequencies and Functions of Discourse Markers in Research Genre, (Master Thesis). Arak University, Arak, Iran
  23. Gholamzadeh, L. (2020). A Study of Discourse Markers in US Presidential Debates in 2016 between Donald John Trump and Hillary Clinton: with Pedagogical Implication, (Master Thesis). Arak University, Arak, Iran
  24. Haselow, A. (2019). Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Retrieved from: <https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.003>
  25. Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  26. Hellerman, J., & Vergen, H. (2007). Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(2), 157–179
  27. Hoseini, H. (2000). Mosht Dar Nemaye Dorosht. Tehran: Sorush [In Persian]
  28. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum
  29. Kassaei, Gh. & Amouzadeh, M. (2020). The combination of Discourse Markers in Persian. International Review of Pragmatics, 12(1), 135-163
  30. Lewis, M. (2006). Discourse markers in English: a discourse-pragmatic view. In K. Fischer, Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 43-61). Oxford: Elsevier
  31. Martínez, A. C. (2002). The use of discourse markers in E.F.L. learners' writing. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 15(4), 123-132.
  32. Maschler, Y. & Schiffrin, D. (2015). Discourse Markers: Language, Meaning, and Context. In N. Tanen, T. Hamilton, and D. Schiffrin. (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 179-221) Oxford: Blackwell
  33. Matei, M. (2010). Discourse markers as functional elements. Buletine of the Transilvania University of Brasov, 25-42
  34. Mohammadi, A. M. (2015). An Introduction to Discourse Monitoring. Pazhuheshhaye Zabanshenakhti Dar Amoozesh Zaban, 4(1), 34-52 [In Persian]
  35. Mohammadi, A. M. & Dehghan, R. (2021). A discoursal analysis of functional spectrum of discourse markers in translation criticism: pedagogic and research implications. Zabanpazhuhi,13(39), 91-114 [In  Persian]  
  36. Mohammadi, A. M. & Radjaie, A. (2020). An analysis of the discoursal uses and functions of ‘AND’ as a discourse marker in Hafiz and Goethe poetry: educational and research implications. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 10(2), 406-421 [In Persian]
  37. Nadi, S. (2020). A Comparative Study of the Frequencies and Functions of Discourse Markers in Iranian University Lectures between M.A teachers and Students: with Pedagogical Implications (Master Thesis). Arak University, Arak, Iran
  38. Nejadansari, D. &. Mohammadi, A. M.  (2014). The frequencies and functions of discourse markers in the Iranian University EFL classroom discourse. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 4(2), 1-18
  39. Oates, S. L. (2000). Multiple Discourse Marker Occurrence. Retrieved from <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2539670.>
  40. Omranpor, M. (2005). Coordinations and their functions in Kelileh Demneh. Pazhuhesh Zaban va Adbiat Farsi, 1(5), 121-146 [In Persian]
  41. Quan, L., & Zheng, L. (2012). A study of self-repair markers in conversation by Chinese English learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(5), 1216-1223.
  42. Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in Language Teaching. London: Cambridge University Press
  43. Sami. P. (2019). On a Discourse Marker Combination in Spoken American English: ‘Oh Well’ as a Case Study. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(7), 109-130
  44. Sayadkooh, A. & Reisi, A. (2017). Functions of Vav in Golestan. Honar Zaban, 1(2), 5-35 [In Persian]
  45. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  46. Schiffrin, D. (2006). Discourse marker research and theory: revisiting and. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 315-339). Amstersam: Elsevier. 
  47. Scholman, M.  & Demberg, V. (2017). Examples and specifications that prove a point. Dialogue and Discourse, 8(2), 56-83.
  48. Seliger, H. & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second Language Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  49. Shafee Kadkani, M. (2006). Poerty Music. Tehran: Aghah [In Persian]
  50. Tanen, N. Hamilton, T. & Schiffrin, D. (Ed.), (2015). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell
  51. Thurmair, M. (1991). Combinatorial regularities for modal particles. Multilingua 10(12), 19-42
  52. Urgelles-Coll, M. (2010). The Syntax and Semantics of Discourse Markers. London: Continuum
  53. Ying, S. (2007). An analysis of discourse markers used by non-native English learners: Its implications for teaching English as a foreign language. Retrieved from: <http://www.kuis.ac.jp/icci.>
ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)
Volume 14, Issue 43 - Serial Number 43
July 2022
Pages 119-144
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics