In production and interpretation of discourse, interlucutors apply discourse markers (DMs) to establish and discover the relationship between discourse units (Crible & Dagand, 2019; Mohammadi & Radjaee, 2020; Schiffrin, 1987). DMs offer metadiscoursive instructions for the interpretation of discourse by the audience. This interactive process is activated through different types of metacommunicative knowledges and skills. Part of this experience embraces knowledge of text to employ grammatical and lexical elements to convey meaning. More important aspect of this faculty is related to metalanguage involving the capability to communicate different individual and social characteristics, to utilize language to communicate feelings, thoughts, and negotiate meaning (Maschler & Schiffrin, 2015). The analysis of DMs co-occurrences and combinations as a metadiscursive strategy can help researchers to predict specific possible patterns of DMs’ categorizations and such empirical and pragmatic findings will build up some foundations for future typological exploration as well as for the theorization of DM co-occurrences and collocations in general (Kassaei & Amouzadeh, 2020). Moreover, research in the area of language fluency has substantiated the positive influence of DMs investigation and analysis on second language acquisition and opens new horizons towards cognitive processes of discourse production and comprehension (Crible & Dagand,2019; Crible & Pascal, 2020). Based on DMs’ combinations sensitivity to contextual variables in real life situations, they develop novel interactive pragmatic strategies in communication in terms of emphasis, fluency of communication, and intimacy among the interlocutors (Jucker & Ziv, 1998). Consequently, the present researcher tried to investigate and compare the uses and pragmatic functions of co-occurrences of DMs in Arabic, English, and Persian texts.
Ahmadi, R. (2018). A Study of Discourse Markers in Quoranic Texts (Master's Term Project). Arak University, Arak, Iran
Aijmir, K. (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: Johan Benjamins
Aysu, S. (2017). The use of discourse markers in the writing of Turkish students. Journal of Higher Education and Sciences, 7(1), 132-138
Boojari, S. (2019). A Comparative Study of the Frequency and Polyfunctionality of Discourse Markers used in A Simple Favor by the American Author Darcey Bell and Betrayal by the British Author Martina Cole: with Pedagogical Implications, (Unpublished Master Thesis), Arak University, Arak, Iran
Bordería, S. (2018). The combination of discourse markers in spontaneous conversations. International Journal of Romance Languages, 53 (1), 121-158
Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic Markers in English: grammaticalization and discourse functions. New York: Mounto de Gruyter
Brinton, L., J. (2015). Historical Discourse Analysis, In N. Tanen, T. Hamilton, and D. Schiffrin. (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, (pp. 222-242) Oxford: Blackwell
Castro, C., M. (2009). The use and functions of discourse markers in EFL classroom interaction. Profile, 11, 57-77
Crible, L., & Degand, L. (2019). Domains and functions: a two-dimensional account of discourse markers. Discours, 4(5),15-30
Crible, L., & Pascual, E. (2020). Combinations of discourse markers with repairs and repetitions in English, French and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 5(7), 54-67
Cuenca, M., & Crible, L. (2019). Co-occurrence of discourse markers in English: From juxtaposition to composition. Journal of Pragmatics, 140(5), 171-184
Cuenca, M. J. & Marin, M. J. (2009). Co-occurence of discourse markers in Catalan and Spanish oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 899-914
Dagand, L. & Cuenca, M. J. (2019). Discourse Marker use: from production to comprehension. Retriever from: <http://www.sle2020.eu/downloads/workshops.>
Dehghan, R. (2020). An Analysis of the Application of Discourse Markers in Translation Criticism (Research Project). Arak University, Arak, Iran
Faghih Malek Marzban, N. (2008). The Functions of Conjunctions. Faslnameh ElmiPazhuheshi olum Ensani, 4(6), 145-168 [In Persian].
Farghal, M. & Samateh, A. (2017). Explicitation vs Implicitation: Disvourse Markers in Translation. Al-Balaqa for Research and Studies, 19(2), 27-49
Fisher, K. (2006). Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amstersam: Elsevier
Frank-Job, B. (2006). A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 359-375). Oxford: Elsevier
Fraser, B. (2006). Towards a theory of discourse markers. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 240-256). Oxford: Elsevier.
Fraser, B. (2013). Combinations of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English. Journal of Pragmatics 30(7), 112-121
Fraser, B. (2015). The combining of Discourse Markers – A beginning. Journal of Pragmatics 86(7), 123-138
Gandomkar, L. (2018). A Comparative Study of the Frequencies and Functions of Discourse Markers in Research Genre, (Master Thesis). Arak University, Arak, Iran
Gholamzadeh, L. (2020). A Study of Discourse Markers in US Presidential Debates in 2016 between Donald John Trump and Hillary Clinton: with Pedagogical Implication, (Master Thesis). Arak University, Arak, Iran
Haselow, A. (2019). Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Retrieved from: <https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.003>
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hellerman, J., & Vergen, H. (2007). Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(2), 157–179
Hoseini, H. (2000). Mosht Dar Nemaye Dorosht. Tehran: Sorush [In Persian]
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum
Kassaei, Gh. & Amouzadeh, M. (2020). The combination of Discourse Markers in Persian. International Review of Pragmatics, 12(1), 135-163
Lewis, M. (2006). Discourse markers in English: a discourse-pragmatic view. In K. Fischer, Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 43-61). Oxford: Elsevier
Martínez, A. C. (2002). The use of discourse markers in E.F.L. learners' writing. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 15(4), 123-132.
Maschler, Y. & Schiffrin, D. (2015). Discourse Markers: Language, Meaning, and Context. In N. Tanen, T. Hamilton, and D. Schiffrin. (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 179-221) Oxford: Blackwell
Matei, M. (2010). Discourse markers as functional elements. Buletine of the Transilvania University of Brasov, 25-42
Mohammadi, A. M. (2015). An Introduction to Discourse Monitoring. Pazhuheshhaye Zabanshenakhti Dar Amoozesh Zaban, 4(1), 34-52 [In Persian]
Mohammadi, A. M. & Dehghan, R. (2021).A discoursal analysis of functional spectrum of discourse markers in translation criticism: pedagogic and research implications. Zabanpazhuhi,13(39), 91-114 [In Persian]
Mohammadi, A. M. & Radjaie, A. (2020). An analysis of the discoursal uses and functions of ‘AND’ as a discourse marker in Hafiz and Goethe poetry: educational and research implications. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 10(2), 406-421 [In Persian]
Nadi, S. (2020). A Comparative Study of the Frequencies and Functions of Discourse Markers in Iranian University Lectures between M.A teachers and Students: with Pedagogical Implications (Master Thesis). Arak University, Arak, Iran
Nejadansari, D. &. Mohammadi, A. M. (2014). The frequencies and functions of discourse markers in the Iranian University EFL classroom discourse. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 4(2), 1-18
Oates, S. L. (2000). Multiple Discourse Marker Occurrence. Retrieved from <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2539670.>
Omranpor, M. (2005). Coordinations and their functions in Kelileh Demneh. Pazhuhesh Zaban va Adbiat Farsi, 1(5), 121-146 [In Persian]
Quan, L., & Zheng, L. (2012). A study of self-repair markers in conversation by Chinese English learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(5), 1216-1223.
Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in Language Teaching. London: Cambridge University Press
Sami. P. (2019). On a Discourse Marker Combination in Spoken American English: ‘Oh Well’ as a Case Study. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(7), 109-130
Sayadkooh, A. & Reisi, A. (2017). Functions of Vav in Golestan. Honar Zaban, 1(2), 5-35 [In Persian]
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffrin, D. (2006). Discourse marker research and theory: revisiting and. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 315-339). Amstersam: Elsevier.
Scholman, M. & Demberg, V. (2017). Examples and specifications that prove a point. Dialogue and Discourse, 8(2), 56-83.
Seliger, H. & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second Language Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Shafee Kadkani, M. (2006). Poerty Music. Tehran: Aghah [In Persian]
Tanen, N. Hamilton, T. & Schiffrin, D. (Ed.), (2015). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell
Thurmair, M. (1991). Combinatorial regularities for modal particles. Multilingua 10(12), 19-42
Urgelles-Coll, M. (2010). The Syntax and Semantics of Discourse Markers. London: Continuum
Ying, S. (2007). An analysis of discourse markers used by non-native English learners: Its implications for teaching English as a foreign language. Retrieved from: <http://www.kuis.ac.jp/icci.>
Mohammadi, A. M. (2022). A Pragmatic Analysis of Co-occurrence of Discourse Markers in texts: Pragmaticalization of Fuunctions. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 14(43), 119-144. doi: 10.22051/jlr.2020.32471.1902
MLA
Ali Mohammad Mohammadi. "A Pragmatic Analysis of Co-occurrence of Discourse Markers in texts: Pragmaticalization of Fuunctions", ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 14, 43, 2022, 119-144. doi: 10.22051/jlr.2020.32471.1902
HARVARD
Mohammadi, A. M. (2022). 'A Pragmatic Analysis of Co-occurrence of Discourse Markers in texts: Pragmaticalization of Fuunctions', ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 14(43), pp. 119-144. doi: 10.22051/jlr.2020.32471.1902
VANCOUVER
Mohammadi, A. M. A Pragmatic Analysis of Co-occurrence of Discourse Markers in texts: Pragmaticalization of Fuunctions. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 2022; 14(43): 119-144. doi: 10.22051/jlr.2020.32471.1902