ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

Zabanpazhuhi

Author Index

Keyword Index

News

Journal Metrics

Publication Ethics

Editorial Board

Aims and Scope

Indexing and Abstracting

FAQ

Related Links

About Journal

Peer Review Process

Executive staff

Subject Areas

Guide for Authors

Editing English articles

Conflict of interest of the author

Commitment

Publons Registration Guide

Reviewers Journal in 1999

Reviewers 2020

List of 2021 Reviewers2021

List of 2021 Reviewers 2022

Reviewers Journal 2023

Analysis of the text coherence model in Persian language of science and its representation in Persian language teaching texts with academic purpose: a corpus based approach

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 PhD candidate in Linguistics, Department of English Languages and Linguistics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Professor, Department of English Languages and Linguistics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

3 Associate professor, Department of English Languages and Linguistics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Considering the growing interest of non-Iranians in pursuing higher education in Iran, the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology statistics indicate this trend. In 1398, out of 129 nationalities, 40,000 foreign students were studying in Iran, requiring Persian language courses as a prerequisite for university entry. These courses focus on teaching scientific Persian in humanities, technology, engineering, and medical sciences. Evaluating the content of available resources and assessing their efficiency in achieving academic language proficiency is crucial.
One of the linguistic theories in the field of language teaching text analysis that has been welcomed by many researchers is the systematic Functional grammar. A review of the conducted researches well confirms that this command has been well-known not only in English, but also in other languages, including Persian, in introducing practical ideas. To be effective for standardizing educational content. From the framework of systematic Functional grammar, we chose the category of coherence for studying Persian texts with academic purposes. Coherence in this command has been proposed as a powerful tool for textualization and texture, as Sojudi (Sojudi, 2009) considers the observance of two features in writing the content of the text, which are 1- coherence and 2- features A structure in which the observance of each affects a better comprehension and reading. He believes that the most basic element in the formation and texture of a text is coherence. Coherence, along with other factors such as text structure and words are the determining factors in the quality of text comprehension. Also, the issue of coherence in the view of some scholars such as Ghazizadeh & Ghonsoli (Ghazizadeh & Ghonsoli, 2011) and Ahmadi and Mirzapour (Mirzapour & Ahmadi, 2011) due to the objectivity of this category in the text as one of the methods of communication between the text and its audience is considered.
Therefore, paying attention to the use of cohesive elements in Persian educational texts with academic goals by the authors and also emphasizing the correct and principled teaching of coherent elements of the text in advanced writing classes causes on the one hand the learner with how Get acquainted with the production and creation of a coherent scientific text and become proficient in writing this register  of texts, and on the other hand, provide better processing and comprehension in these register s of texts that seem to have semantic complexity due to their content. . According to the issues raised, the present study has two main objectives. First, by studying the volume of academic scientific texts in the field of social sciences, to achieve the pattern of application of textual coherence tools in books in this field, and the second goal is to represent and match the pattern extracted in Persian language teaching texts with academic goals in the same scientific. It is worth mentioning that in the discussion of teaching Persian language to non-Persian speakers, in recent years, as much as the content assessment and educational needs assessment of Persian language teaching resources for general purposes, Persian books with academic purposes have not been paid enough attention.
1-What are the characteristics of the pattern of application of cohesive elements in academic scientific texts in the field of social sciences?
2-To what extent do social science texts for foreign learners correspond to the pattern extracted from the same academic texts in terms of lexical and grammatical coherence elements?

Keywords

References
  1. Aghaei, K. & Rajabi, M. (2019). Exploring the cohesives in written and spoken texts of “lets learn Persian to speakers of other languages” on Halliday and Hassan’s (1976). Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of other languages, 8, 1(17), 157-182. https://doi.org/10.30479/jtpsol.2019.8890.1375 [In Persian].
  2. Ahmadi, H. (2004). Sociology of Deviance, Tehran: Samt. Retrieved from <https://samt.ac.ir/fa/book/625/> [In Persian].
  3. Akindele, J. (2012). Cohesive Devices in Selected ESL Academic Papers. African Nebula, 1(3), 99-112. 
  4. Alizadeh Memmar, Z. & Kamyabigil, A. (2021). A study on Cohesive Devices in the Writing of advanced Persian Learners. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of other Languag,10, 53-81. https://doi.org/10.3479/JTPSOL.2020.13069.1480 [In Persian].
  5. Ansary, H. (2000). Scientific English discourse for Teacher Education, Allameh Tabatabai University Press, Tehran [In Persian].
  6. Bagheri Najafabad, Z. & Rahimian, J. (2019). Analysis of the content of Persian textbooks (teaching Persian language to non-Persian speakers) based on learners' age. Technology of Education, 13(1), 49, 135-144. https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2018.2887.1761 [In Persian].
  7. Bamford, J. (2005). “Subjective or Objective evaluation?: Prediction in Academic Lectures”. In E. Tognini Bonelli & G. Dell Lungo Camiciotti (Eds.) Strategies in Academic Discourse (pp. 17-29). Amesterdom/ Philadelphia: Benjamin Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.19.
  8. Charles, M. (2013). English for Academic Purposes. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes (pp. 137-153). English Language- Study and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch7
  9. Crossly, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Predicting Second language writing Proficiency: The Roles of Cohesion and Linguistic Sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 15-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01449.x
  10. Darian, S. (2003). Understanding the Language of Science. Austin: University of Texas Press. Retrieved from <https://utpress.utexas.edu/9780292716186/>
  11. Davari Ardakani, N., & Aghaebrahimi, H. (2012). The Authenticity of Three PFL Textbook from the Cohesion Viewpoint. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Language, 1(1), 1511-168. Retrieved from <https://jtpsol.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_144.html> [In Persian].
  12. Eun-Young, J & Hoc kyeung, K. (2016). Pedagogical Potentials devices for EFL writing. English Language Teaching, 28(2), 29-45. Retrieved from < https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-teaching/all-issues>
  13. Ghazizadeh, K., & Ghonsoli, B. (2011). A Study of Registers in Written Texts in Public Means of Transportation based on Halliday’s seven functions of language. Language and Translation Studies, 1, 111-125. Retrieved from < https://jlts.um.ac.ir/?lang=en>
  14. Qayyumzadeh, S., & Zandi, B. (2016). Examining cohesion factors in academic physics texts. Proceedings of the first national conference on criticism of humanities texts and books. Tehran, Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. 51-64. Retrieved from < https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20171223151512-10133-30.pdf> [In Persian].
  15. Halliday, M. A. K. & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836010
  16. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hassan, R. (1986). Language, Context: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Deakin University Press. Retrieved from <https://www.amazon.com/Language-Context-Text-Social-Semiotic-Perspective/dp/0194371549.>
  17. Hamedi shirvan, Z. & Abbasnejad, H. (2016). A Comparative Analysis of Cohesive Devices in Non-Persian Learners Writing. Language Analysis, 2(3), 37-62. Retrieved from <https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1277168> [In Persian].
  18. Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
  19. Mehrabi Sari, I. (2016). Developmental process in the use of lexical cohesive devices in Persian-speaking children. Language Related Research, 6(7), 183-204. Retrieved from http://lrr.modares.ac.ir/article-14-9615-fa.html
  20. Mirzapour, F. & Ahmadi, M. (2011). Study on Lexical Cohesion in English and Persian Research Articles:  A Comparative Study. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p245
  21. Mohammadnezhad Alizamini, Y & Elahian, L. (2017). Exploring the representation of processes in Persian language learning textbooks: A case study based on systemic functional linguistics. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 6(14), 17-38. Retrieved from <https://www.magiran.com/paper/1890725/> [In Persian].
  22. Rostambeyk Tafreshi, A., Hajirezaei, A., Assi, M., & Pahlavanzadeh, M. (2017). An analysis of the development of grammatical cohesion in Persian: Speaking student’s writing discourse. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 24(12), 45-72. Retrieved from < https://lsi-linguistics.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2468.html> [In Persian].
  23. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Routledge.
  24. Sedigh Sarvestani, R. (2008). Social Pathology. Tehran: SAMT. Retrieved from <https://samt.ac.ir/fa/book/1551/> [In Persian].
  25. Sharepour, M. (2009). Urban Sociology, Tehran: SAMT. Retrieved from <https://samt.ac.ir/fa/book/1055/> [In Persian]. 
  26. Strevens, P. (1988). Esp after twenty years: are- appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.) Esp: state of the Art. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional language center. Retrieved from <https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2487136.>
  27. Strevens, P. (1976). Problems of learning and teaching science through a foreign language. Studies in Science Education, 3(1), 55-65. Retrieved from <https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ134984>
  28. Vakilifard, A., Mirzaee Hesarian, M., & Ahmadi Khalkhali, N. (2019). Persian for Academic Purpose: Analysis of Textbook, Persian Specific for Social science. Biannual Journal University Textbooks, Research and Writing, 23(44), 21-48. https://doi.org/10.30487/RWAB.2019.36379 [In Persian].
  29. Vakilifard, A., Mirzaee Hesarian, M., & Bahremi, H. (2019). Social Science, Tehran: Farhikhtegan   Publication. Retrieved from <https://www.gisoom.com/book/11669569/> [In Persian].
  30. Widdowson, H. (1979). Explorations in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. (Vol.1). https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-5986/5386.
  31. Widdowson, H. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University press. Retrieved from <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49617977_HG_WIDDOWSON_Learning_Purpose_and_Language_Use_HG_WID>
  32. Zandi, B, Poorjavadi, A & Armion, M. (2006). Features of the Scientific Language in The Chemistry Books of The Iranian High School, Quarterly Peyke Noor Journal, 3(4), 36-48. Retrieved from <https://www.sid.ir/paper/128783/fa> [In Persian].
ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)
Volume 16, Issue 50 - Serial Number 50
April 2024
Pages 281-311
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics