ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

Zabanpazhuhi

Author Index

Keyword Index

News

Journal Metrics

Publication Ethics

Editorial Board

Aims and Scope

Indexing and Abstracting

FAQ

Related Links

About Journal

Peer Review Process

Executive staff

Subject Areas

Guide for Authors

Editing English articles

Conflict of interest of the author

Commitment

Publons Registration Guide

Reviewers Journal in 1999

Reviewers 2020

List of 2021 Reviewers2021

List of 2021 Reviewers 2022

Reviewers Journal 2023

Analysis of the Tensive Discourse System in Imam Ali (AS) ’s Letters to Mu’awiyah in Nahj al-Balaghah

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 PhD student, Department of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Theology, University of Isfahan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Theology, University of Isfahan . Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Theology, University of Isfahan, Iran.

4 Professor, Department of French Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

5 Associate Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Semiotic-semantic discourse analysis, as a suitable model for religious text analysis, particularly Nahj al-Balagha, utilizes the tensive semiotics model introduced by Jacques Fontanille and Claude Zilberberg. This model delves into the intricate interplay between intensive (emotional, internal) and expansive (cognitive, external) valencies, offering valuable insights into the dynamic structure of the text, emphasizing the tensive-active and sensory-perceptive relationships. This article explores how meaning is intricately woven in the enunciation, bridging the gap between quantitative and qualitative dimensions, thus shedding light on the production of meaning in the discourse processes within the Imam's letters to Mu’awiyah. The study transcends a mere analysis of the fixed letter structure, focusing on the fluid and adaptable nature of the letters' production process and the interactive dimension between the agent and the actor in the enunciation space.

Keywords

References
  1. Abbasi, A., & Yarmand. H. (2011). Crossing the semantic square to the stress square: a sign-semantic study of the short story the Little Black Fish. Quarterly Journal of Comparative Language and Literature Research, 3(2), 147-172, [in Persian].
  2. Babak Moin, M. (2017). The Missing Dimensions of Meaning in Classic Narrative Semiotics "Adaptive Semantic System or Dance in Interaction". Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications [In Persian].
  3. Bahrani, I. M. (2007). A commentary of Nahj al-Balaghah by Ibn Maytham. Bahrain: Al-Fakhrawi Publications, [in Arabic].
  4. Davoodi Moghadam, F. (2012). A semiotic-semantic analysis of poems Arash Kamangir and The Eagle: the evolution of confrontational function of language to the tensive process. Journal of Language Related Research, 4(1), 124-105, [in Persian].
  5. Faisal, H. T. G. (n.d.). Repetition in the Qur’anic Fasilah (rhymes) in the last chapter of the Qur’an as a stylistic study model. Palestine: Al-Quds Open University, [in Arabic].
  6. Fazeli Mahboud, S., & Alizadeh Klur, M. (2015). A semiotic-semantic study of the emotive discourse system in the poem Bon voyage! by Shafiee Kadkani. Journal of Linguistic Research, 6(1), 205- 228, [in Persian].
  7. Fontanille, J. (1998). Sémiotique du discours. Limoge: PULIM.
  8. Fontanille, J. (1999). Sémiotique et littérature. Essais de méthode. Paris: PUF.
  9. Fontanille, J. (2006). The Semiotics of discourse (trans. Heidi Bostic). New York: Peter Lang.
  10. Fotouhi, M. (2010). Image rhetoric (2nd edition). Tehran: Sokhan Publications, [in Persian].
  11. Greimas, J., & Fontanille, J. (1992). The Semiotics of Passion from States of Affairs to States of Feelings. USA: U of Minnesota Press
  12. Ibn Jani, A. (1955). Features. (M. A. Al-Na’ar, Trans.). Beirut: Dar Al-Kitab Al-Arabi, [in Arabic].
  13. Kanani, E. (2017). Analysis of the tensive-linguistic function of light and the dimensions of its semantic system in the discourse system of the poems East of Sorrow grief and Green Volume. Journal of Linguistic Research, 8(2), 25-52, [in Persian].
  14. Khazali, E., & Hashemiyan, M. (2016). In a revealing lexical cohesion of Imam Ali (AS) to Al. Religious Literature and Art, 1(2), 31-57 [In Persian].
  15. Mohassess, M. (2017). Application of the discourse of silence in the letter of Imam Ali’s to Mu’awiyah. Quarterly Research Journal of Research of Nahjolbalagheh, 53, 113-139, [in Persian].
  16. Mostafavi, H. S., Shairi, H. R., & Rahnama, H. (2013). “From ignorant dignity to Qur’anic dignity; Semiotics of discourse processes of dignity in the Qur’an with a pattern of tension. Journal of Qur’anic Interpretation and language. 1 (2), 24 – 42, [in Persian].
  17. Mousavi Baladeh, S. M. (2003). Halilat of al-Quran: Tajwid of Quran. Tehran. Ihya al-Kitab, [in Persian].
  18. Nasiri, R., Moti, M., & Amiri, M. (2018). Semiotic analysis of discourse in Sura Naba’ based on the tensive model. Al-Zahra University Journal of Language Research, 10(30), 119-148, [in Persian].
  19. Pakatchi, A., Shairi, H., & Rahnamaa, H. (2015). Tensive semiotics of discourse in surat al-Qāriah; a new approach in the semiotics of the qurānic discourse. Journal of Language Related Research, 6 (4), 39-68, [in Persian].
  20. Saghir, M. A. H. (2000). The linguistic voice in the Qur’an. Beirut: Dar Al-Muvarrikh Al-Arabi, [in Arabic].
  21. Sahiri, H. R. (2009). From structural semiotics to discourse semiotic-semantics. Journal of Literary Criticism, 2(8), 33-51, [in Persian].
  22. Sajady, S. A., & Kochaki Niyat, Z. (2019). Analysis of Imam Ali’s letters to Muaviieh with a structuralist approach. Religious Literature and Art, 4(15), 9-37. doi: 10.22081/jrla.2020.55482.1243 [In Persian].
  23. Seyedi, S. H., & Abdi, Z. (2005). A musical analysis of Juzʼ 30 of the Holy Qur’an. Journal of Humanities, 47 & 48, 59 -74, [in Persian].
  24. Seyedi, S. H., & Haji Rajabi, N. (2015). Stylistics of ‘Arafa Prayer. Journal of Islamic, Quranic, & Hadith Studies, 47, 29-47, [in Persian].
  25. Shairi, H. R. (2005). An examination of the basic role of perception in meaning production. Journal of Human Sciences, 45 & 46, 131 - 146, [in Persian].
  26. Shairi, H. R. (2005). Study of the tensive process of literary discourse. Journal of Foreign language research, 25, 187- 204, [in Persian].
  27. Shairi, H. R. (2006). Semiotic-semantic analysis of discourse. Tehran: SAMT, [in Persian].
  28. Shairi, H. R. (2007). An Investigation of discoursal systems types from the Semiotic-semantic perspective". In M. Dabirmoghadam, A. Golfam and M. Assi (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Iran Linguistic Conference (pp. 106-119). Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University [In Persian].
  29. Shairi, H. R., & Vafaie, T. (2009). A path to fluid semiotics. Tehran: Iranian Scientific-Cultural Publications, [in Persian].
  30. Shairi, H. R. (2009). From constructionist semiotics to discursive semiotics. Journal of Literary Criticism, 2(8), 33-51 [In Persian].
  31. Shairi, H. R. (2013). Analayse Semiotique du Discour. Tehran: SAMT [In Persian].
  32. Shairi, H. R. (2016). Discourse resistance, insistence and appeasement: The realms of discourse and its semiotic functions. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 16(1), 110-128 [In Persian].
  33. Zarkoob, M., Khaqani, M., & Javidi, M. (2013). The approach of linked and linkage units in the Arabic language. Al-Zahra University Quarterly Journal of Language Research, 4(8), 67-95, [in Persian]
ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)
Volume 15, Issue 48
December 2023
Pages 89-113
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics