ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

Zabanpazhuhi

Author Index

Keyword Index

News

Journal Metrics

Publication Ethics

Editorial Board

Aims and Scope

Indexing and Abstracting

FAQ

Related Links

About Journal

Peer Review Process

Executive staff

Subject Areas

Guide for Authors

Editing English articles

Conflict of interest of the author

Commitment

Publons Registration Guide

Reviewers Journal in 1999

Reviewers 2020

List of 2021 Reviewers2021

List of 2021 Reviewers 2022

Reviewers Journal 2023

The Cultuling of Insult in the Teenage Novel Based on the Heims' approach (The case study of Abnabat Collection)

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 Persian Language & Literature, Narjes College, Valiasr University of Rafsanjan, Iran

2 Persian Language & Literature, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran

Abstract

Language plays various roles, and the significance of these roles varies across different societies. The communicative role, however, can be considered one of the most pivotal functions of language. Through communication, social categories, socio-political ideologies, relationships, individual social networks, and social control can be identified and influenced. According to Troike (2003), language has a clear role in social control because it directly conveys instructions to people. Humorous works serve as a significant source for shaping a society's culture, and an examination of the language used in these works can provide insights into the culture of that society. Profanity is a speech genre within popular culture, and its usage in humorous texts has seen substantial growth in recent decades. This research investigates the use of profanity in Sedgi's "Abnabat" collection using Hymes' model. In addition to classifying the profanities in this collection, we analyze the motivations behind their usage, aiming to answer the following questions: What functions do profanities serve in this novel? Is the use of profanity in this humor collection appropriate for the genre of the work and its intended audience?

Keywords

References
  1. Afraz Borujeni, M. (2011). The Exploration of Content and Linguistic Structure of Taboo Worlds in The Contemporary Persian Stories (Master’s thesis). Shahrekorrd University, Shahrekord, Iran [In Persian].
  2. Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 28.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Fowler, R. (1996). Linguistic Criticism, (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Ghorbanpoor Arani. H., Zarei, A., Arabshahi, E. (2017). The Socio-cultural Aspects of Bumper Stickers Based on Dell Hymes’ Ethnography, 18 (38), 177-200.
  5. Hymes, D. (1967). Models of interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 33(2), 8-28.
  6. Jay, T. (2000). Why we curse: a neuro-psycho-social theory of speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
  7. Maghsoudi, M. (2021). Reconsidering Respect Cultuling in the Light of Etiquette through Corpus. 12 (2), 385-419 [In Persian].
  8. Mehrabi, M., & Mahmoudi Bakhtiari, B. (2021). The Cultuling of "Insult" in My Uncle Napoleon and English Equivalents: A Corpus-Based Study. Language and Culture, 53 (4), 31-59 [In Persian].
  9. Modarres Khiyabani, S. (2013). An analysis of the number of taboos used in the I.R.I.B. Comedy series. Quarterly Journal of Lifestyle Studies, 2(15), 57-76. [In Persian]
  10. Pishghadam, R., & Firooziyan Pour Esfahani, A. (2017). A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Discourse Functions of 'I don't know' in Persian Language: Hymes’ SPEAKING Model. Cultur-Communication Studies, Volume 18, Issue 37 - Serial Number 69, pp. 7-35 [In Persian].
  11. Pishghadam, R., & Attaran, A. (2014). A Sociological Comparison of Speech Acts of Swearing: A Case Study of Persian and English Languages. Journal of Language and Translation Studies, 46(4), 25-50. [In Persian].
  12. Pishghadam, R., Firouzian Poresfahani, I., Firouzian Poresfahani, I. (2020). Introducing Cherophobia Cultuling: a Close Look into the Discursive Functions of Death-oriented Terms in Persian Language.  Journal of Culture-Communication Studies, 21(49), 181-206 [In Persian].
  13. Pishghadam, R., & Norouz Kermanshahi, P. (2016). Relationship between language, religion, and culture: Research and analysis of the functions of the Hajji and related terms in Persian language. Zabanpazhuhi, 20, 27-51. [In Persian].
  14. Pishghadam, R. (2012). Introduced "Zbahang" as a transformational tool in the culture of mining Language. Language and Translation Studies, 4, 47-62. [In Persian].
  15. Pishghadam, R., et al. (2020). Introducing Cherophobia Cultuling: A Close Look into the Discursive Functions of Death-oriented Terms in the Persian Language. Cultur-Communication Studies, 21(49), 181-206. [In Persian].
  16. Pishghadam, R., et al. (2014). A Sociological Look into Speech Act of Cursing: A Comparison of Persian and English Languages. Language and Translation, 2(47), 45-71. [In Persian].
  17. Saadatnejad, Z., & Farsian, M. R. (2020). Improving Intercultural Competence through Literary Texts and the Strategies of Teaching it in French Language. 10(6), 345-372. [In Persian].
  18. Sarli, N. G. (2008). Persian Standard Language. Tehran: Hermes. [In Persian].
  19. Sedghi, M. (2015). Abnabat-e-Darchini. Tehran: Sure-ye Mehr. [In Persian].
  20. Sedghi, M. (2018). Abnabat-e-Pestei. Tehran: Charkh-o-Falak. [In Persian].
  21. Sedghi, M. (2013). Abnabat-e-Heldar. Tehran: Sure-ye Mehr. [In Persian].
  22. Sheykhhoseini, Z. (2021). Humor and Implied Reader in Sedghi’s Abnabat, Adab-e-Farsi, 10 (2), 125-146 [In Persian].
  23. Troike, M. S. (1996). The ethnography of communication. In Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 351-366).
  24. Troike, M. S. (2003). The Ethnography of Communication (3rd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)
Volume 15, Issue 48
December 2023
Pages 143-161
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics