ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

Zabanpazhuhi

Author Index

Keyword Index

News

Journal Metrics

Publication Ethics

Editorial Board

Aims and Scope

Indexing and Abstracting

FAQ

Related Links

About Journal

Peer Review Process

Executive staff

Subject Areas

Guide for Authors

Editing English articles

Conflict of interest of the author

Commitment

Publons Registration Guide

Reviewers Journal in 1999

Reviewers 2020

List of 2021 Reviewers2021

List of 2021 Reviewers 2022

Reviewers Journal 2023

The study of Persian Clitic Left Dislocation construction in the Minimalist Program

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of Linguistics, Department of linguistics, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of linguistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

The present study investigates how the Persian Clitic Left Dislocation construction (CLLD) is derived within the framework of minimalist program. In CLLD an element of a sentence is located at the beginning of the clause instead of being in its canonical position and its main position in the sentence is necessarily occupied by a resumptive clitic. In studying such construction in different languages, researchers always try to answer the question whether the initial position is the result of movement or it is base-generated. Chomsky (1977) and Cinque (1990) are among the linguists who believe that initial position in CLLD is base-generated. On the other hand, Lopez (2009) and Dobrovie-Sorin (1990) try to show that this position is derived by movement. Lee (2016) believes that this disagreement is because of the hybrid characteristics of CLLD. As an example, sensitivity to strong islands shows that movement takes place in this construction; but insensitivity to weak islands or not showing weak cross over (WCO) effect can challenge the movement approach to CLLD. Rizzi (1997) believes that only constructions which derived by quantificational Aʹ-movement show WCO effect; so Lee (2016) considers CLLD as the result of non-quantificational Aʹ-movement; so insensitivity to weak islands can’t challenge the movement idea of CLLD derivation.  In this research we study the syntactic features of Persian CLLD to investigate whether the initial position of this structure is base-generated or it’s the result of movement. And if it is the result of movement, what kind of movement is involved.

Keywords

References
  1. Anushe. M. (2010). Topicalization and focus movement in Persian, a feature-based approach. Journal of Language Research, 1(1), 1-28. Retrieved from <https://jolr.ut.ac.ir/article_21386.html> [In Persian]
  2. Anushe. M. (2021). Morphology in Syntax; From Minimalist Program to Distributed Morphology. Tehran: Tehran University Press. Retrieved from <https://ketab.ir/book/cc69a166-2afa-44a3-8b03-5f486eaa90fc> [In Persian]
  3. Asadimofarah. T., & Darzi, A. (2019). Split DP in Persian – a minimalist approach. Journal of Language Research, 10(2), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.22059/jolr.2020.281064.666505 [In Persian] 
  4. Boeckx, T. C. (2008). Understanding Minimalist Syntax: Lessons from Locality in Long-distance Dependencies. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Retrieved from <https://philpapers.org/rec/BOEUMS.>
  5. Chomsky, N. (1977). On Wh-movement. In P. Culicover, T. Wasow, A. Akmajian (Eds.). Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press. Retrieved from <https://babel.ucsc.edu/~hank/On_WH-Movement.pdf>
  6. Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In K. Hale (Ed.). A Life in Linguistics. 1-52. Cambridge: MIT Press. Retrieved from <https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1839270>
  7. Cinque, G. (1990). Types of Ā-dependencies. Cambridge Ma: MIT Press. Retrieved from <https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262530897/types-of-a-dependencies/>
  8. Cinque, G. (1994). On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In G. Cinque, J. Koster, J. Pollak, L. Rizzi & R. Zanuttini (Eds). Path Towards Universal Grammar. Studies in Honour of Richard Kayne. Georgetown University Press. Washington D.C. Retrieved from <https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/244e78c188a8984602575eae6b0de11bb/joostkremers.>
  9. Cinque, G. (2010). The Syntax of Adjectives: a Comparative Study. Linguistic Inquiry, Monograph57. MIT Press: Cambridge. Retrieved from <https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262514262/the-syntax-of-adjectives/>
  10. DabirMoghaddam, M. (1990). About ‘ra’ in Persian. Journal of Linguistics. 7(1), 2-60. Retrieved from <https://www.sid.ir/paper/431030/fa> [In Persian].
  11. DabirMoghaddam, M. (2004). Persian language and linguistic theories: in search of a framework for compiling a comprehensive Persian language grammar. Syntax. 1, 93-129. Retrieved from <https://www.sid.ir/paper/455147/fa> [In Persian]
  12. Darzi, A. (2006). The need to distinguish between the process of raizing and topicalization in the Persian language. Syntax, 2(1), 161-187. Retrieved from [In Persian]. Retrieved from <https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20130623091947-9821-9.pdf.>
  13. Darzi, A., & Marzban, Z. (2014). Freezing effects and canonical subject position in Persian. Research in Linguistics, 6(1), 17-34. Retrieved from <https://jrl.ui.ac.ir/article_17259_380d2e699ba14836567ae6dcf442c644.pdf> [In Persian].
  14. Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (1990). Clitic doubling, wh-movement, and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 351-397. URL: Retrieved from <https://sfb1252.unikoeln.de/sites/sfb_1252/user_upload/Pdfs_Publikationen/Heusinger_Tiga__u_2019_Clitic_doubling_Differential.pdf.>
  15. Escobar, L. (1997). Clitic Left Dislocation and other relatives. In E. Anagnostopoulou, H. Riemsdijk & F. Zwart, (Eds.). Materials on Left Dislocation. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. (pp. 233-274). https://doi.org/10.1075/la.14.13esc
  16. Franco, J. (1993). On Object Agreement in Spanish. (PhD Dissertation). Department of Spanish and Portuguese. USC. Log Angles.
  17. Ghomeshi, J. (1997). Topics in Persian VPs. Lingua, 102, 133-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(97)00005-3.
  18. Heydari, A., Samaee, M., Atari, L., & Rohi, A. (2015). Azari-Turkish/Persian bilinguals’ code-switching based on matrix language frame model (MLF) and null theory. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 7(16), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.22051/jlr.2015.2089 [In Persian]
  19. Kahnemuyipour, A. (2014). Revisiting the Persian Ezafe construction: A roll-up movement analysis. Lingua. 150, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.012.
  20. Karimi, S. (2005). A Minimalist Approach to Scrambling Evidence from Persian. Berlin: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199796
  21. Karimi, Y. (2007). Kurdish Ezafe construction: Implications for DP structure. Lingua, 117, 2159-2177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.010.
  22. Koopman, H. (2000). Prepositions, postpositions, circum-positions, and particles. In Koopman, H. (Ed.). The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads. 204-260. London: Routledge. Retrieved from <https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/koopman/papers/PP.PDF>
  23. Koopman, H., Sportiche, D. (1983). Variables and the bijection principle. The Linguistic Review, 2, 139-160. Retrieved from <https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/VARIABLES-AND-THE BIJECTION-PRINCIPLE-Koopman-Sportiche/ e68454454c4cf398bf10a926a5cead1c48499904.>
  24. Lasnik, H., & Stowell, T. (1991). Weakest Crossover. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 687-720. Retrieved from <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178746.>
  25. Lee, M. (2016). Spanish Clitic Left Dislocation as a non-quantificational A’movement. Language Research, 52(2) 283-310. Retrieved from <https://hdl.handle.net/10371/97058.>
  26. Moezzi Pour, F. (2019). A remark on Persian left-dislocation and the related challenges for role and reference. Journal of Researches in Linguistics, 11(2), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.22108/JRL.2019.115388.1308 [In Persian]
  27. Mowlaei Kohbanani, H. (2021). Typological study of resumptive pronouns in Persian relative clause. Journal of Linguistics & Khorasan Dialects, 4 (24), 113-139. https://doi.org/10.22067/jlkd.2021.70621.1033. [In Persian]
  28. Pahlavannejad, M. (2008). Island Structures in Persian language. Persian Literature Quarterly, 19, 59-69. Retrieved from <https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20120426164324-5161-3.pdf> [In Persian]
  29. Pesetsky, D. (1998). Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In P. Barbosa, D. Fox, M. McGinnis & D. Pesetsky (Eds.). Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax. (pp. 83-337). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3F47MGW
  30. Rafsanjani Nejad, S., & Dabir Moghaddam, M. (2018). Phase theory and geodesic. Journal of Researches in Linguistics, 11(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.22108/JRL.2018.112291.1236 [In Persian]
  31. Rasekh Mahand, M. (2008). Resumptive pronouns in Persian. Syntax, 4(10). 183-189. Retrieved from <https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20130623092004-9821-19.pdf> [In Persian]
  32. Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.). Elements of Grammar. (pp. 281-337). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7.
  33. Sadeghi, A. (1970). Ra in today Persian. Tabriz Faculty of Literature and Humanities, 93, 9-22. Retrieved from <https://perlit.tabrizu.ac.ir/> [In Persian]
  34. Sportiche, D. (1992). Clitic Constructions. Los Angeles: UCLA. Retrieved from <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_9>
  35. Tafakori Rezaii, S. (2011). Movement in Persian Fak-e-Ezafe. Annual Scientific Conference of Razi University. 19 Azar. Kermanshah. Razi University. Retrieved from <https://civilica.com/doc/288591/> [In Persain] 
  36. Vat, J. (1981). Left Dislocation, connectedness and reconstruction. unpublished article. University of Amsterdam. Retrieved from <https://ugp.rug.nl/GAGL/article/view/30208/27509.>
  37. Zahedi, K., KhaliGhi, M., Abolhasani Chimeh, Z., & Golfam, A. (2012). Resumptive pronouns in Persian. Language Related Research, 3(3), 101-121. Retrieved from <https://www.sid.ir/paper/166031/fa> [In Persian]
ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)
Volume 16, Issue 50 - Serial Number 50
April 2024
Pages 39-64
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics