A Gender-and Age-based Study of “Taboo Words” in the Speech of Persian Speakers

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 MA student of General Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Department of Linguistics, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

Language, as a means of communication, is continually influenced by our society, which is why the reflection of social variables in our everyday speech is inevitable. Among different social factors, sociolinguistic researchers have extensively investigated the correlation between “gender” and linguistic categories to examine the language features of men and women. Lakoff & Bucholtz (2004) suggested that women’s speech is characterized by linguistic features such as precise color terms, polite forms (e.g., indirect requests), tag questions, and empathic stress. In this regard, Holmes (2013, p. 308) claimed that many of the features identified as the characteristics of women’s language are positive politeness devices expressing solidarity.
Politeness and “taboo words”, on the other hand, have been the focus of many sociolinguistic researches, such as Jay (2009), Batisttella (2005) and Wardhaugh’s (2006). Jay (2009, p. 156) claims that both “gender” and “age” can affect word choice and frequency; men swear more frequently in public than women. As for age, the swearing rate peak in the teenage years and declines thereafter (Jay, 2009, p. 156). The present research aims to conduct a gender- and age-based study of “taboo words” in the everyday speech of Persian-speaking men and women and to answer the following questions:

How does “gender” affect the frequency and use of “taboo words” in the everyday speech of Persian speakers?
How the “age” of Persian speakers affect the use of “taboo words”?
Which types of “taboo words” do Persian speakers use in their speech?

Keywords


  1. Alqahtani, S. M., Busabaa, N. A., & Salih, H. M. (2022). A change in Saudi attitudes from use of euphemism to taboo: A sociolinguistic study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(3), 561-571. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1303.12
  2. Arbab, S. (2013). The study and the classification of Persian colloquial taboo words. Journal of Comparative Linguistic Researches, 2(4), 107-124. Retrieved from https://www.magiran.com/p1098775 [In Persian]
  3. Battistella, E. (2005). Bad language: Are some words better than others? Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.30465/lsi.2020.7582
  4. Gao, C. (2013). A sociolinguistic study of English taboo language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2310-2314. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2310-2314
  5. Gao, G. (2008). Taboo language in Sex and the City: An analysis of gender differences in using taboo language in conversation. Retrieved from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-943
  6. Hashamdar, M., & Rafi, F. (2018). Social identity and use of taboo words in angry mood: A gender study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8, 623-629. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0806.11
  7. Holmes, J. (1992). Women's talk in public contexts. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 131-150. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42887783
  8. Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833057
  9. Houssaini, K. (2019). A sociolinguistic approach of taboo words in Moroccan society. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 15(29), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n29p37
  10. Jay, T. (1996). What to do when your students talk dirty. Resource Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.ru/books?id=-ekBAAAACAAJ
  11. Jay, T. (2009). The utility and ubiquity of taboo words. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01115.x
  12. Lakoff, R. T., & Bucholtz, M. (2004). Language and woman's place: Text and commentaries. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ru/books?id=d-xMEdpNhzAC
  13. Rahmayani, D. P., & Fitrawati, F. (2018). Analysis types and functions of taboo words in The Wolf of Wall Street movie. English Language and Literature, 7(3), 2310-2314. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v7i3.101187
  14. Rezaee, F., Rahbar, B., & Oroji, M. (2022). Evaluation of the speaker's politeness based on unequal social status and the gender of the audience with equal social status in the university environment. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 14(45), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.22051/JLR.2021.33081.1927 [In Persian]
  15. Sari, Y. P. (2020). An analysis of types of taboo words in Parker movie. Humanis, 24(3), 232-237. https://doi.org/10.24843/JH.2020.v24.i03.p01
  16. Tafaroji Yeganeh, M. (2017). The sociolinguistics analysis of taboo application in Iranian cinematic films and its relation with actor or actress' gender. Journal of Culture-Communication Studies, 17(35), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.22083/jccs.2016.42575
  17. Wardhaugh, R. (2009). An introduction to sociolinguistics (6th ed.). Wiley. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=N7U3HkPpj_MC
  18. Wene, I. W., & Ena, O. T. (2020). Cursing, sexual harassment, profanity, obscenity and epithet in Dallas Buyers Club movie. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 5(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i1.8920