Document Type : Research
Authors
1 Assistant professor, Department of EFL and Linguistics, Ayatollah Boroujerdi University
2 Aassistant professor, Department of EFL and Linguistics, Rasht Islamic Azad University
Abstract
This article investigates the comitative constructions in Persian. These constructions consist of three members named accompanion, accompanee and accompanying setting. Previously, studies considered ‘bā’ (WITH) as a preposition in traditional grammar. All traditional grammarians introduced ‘bā’ as a preposition except those who pointed to ‘bā’ (WITH) in accompanying situations. One of the aims of the present research is to answer this question: Is ‘bā’(WITH) a preposition in all sentences or is it a conjunction or both? So, this study attempts to show its syntactic and functional features in Persian. Another goal is to compare coordinated and comitative constructions. The hypothesis is that ‘bā’(WITH) can be considered as a conjunctor and a preposition as well. Thus comitative constructions are divided into two groups: 1) symmetrical constructions in which [ with + DP2 ] is not an adjunct (an argument). The type of the verbs in this group are as follows: collectives, combining, relational predicates and similar comparison. 2) asymmetrical constructions in which [ with + DP2 ] is an adjunct. The second type does not depend on the type of the verbs. It consists some members named non-collective verbs, instrumental, body organ, transportation. The instrumental type are of mediatory and facilitating. The findings of the present article can be used in the teaching of Persian grammar as well as syntactic analyses.
Keywords
- Comitative construction
- Symmetrical comitative
- asymmetrical comitative
- conjunctive coordination
- Persian Language
Main Subjects
- Anvari, H., and Ahmadi-Givi, H. (2001). The Grammar of Persian Language. Tehran: Fatemi Cultural Institution.
- Chomsky, Noam. (1957). Syntactic structures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009
- Chomsky, Noam. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T.Press. https://doi.org/10.21236/ad0616323
- Fayazi. M. S. (2013). A cognitive approach with the concept of coordination in contemporary Persian. 5th International Conference of cognitive science, book of abstracts, 117.
- Gholamali-zadeh, Kh. (2007). The Construction of Persian Language. Tehran: Fatemi Cultural Institution.
- Haspelmath, M. (2000). Coordination. In S. Timothy (Eds.), Language Typology and Linguistic Description (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511619434.001
- Haspelmath, M. (2004). Coordinating constructions. Typological Studies in Language, 58. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.58.03has
- Kalbasi, I. (1997). Kelardasht dialect. Tehran: Pazhuheshgah Olum Ensani va Motaleat Farhangi.
- Kayne, Richard. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803372.1
- Lazard, G. (2014). The Grammar of Contemporary Persian. Translated by Bahreini, M. Tehran: Hermes.
- Mahoutian, Sh. (1999). The Construction of Persian Language; a typological approach. Translated by Samai, M. Tehran: Markaz.
- Marantz A.P. (1984). On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: the MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/415485
- Natel Khanlari, P. (2001). The Grammar of Persian Language. Tehran: Toos Publishing Company.
- Natel Khanlari, P. (2013). The Grammar of Persian Language. Tehran: Toos Publishing Company.
- Paperno, D. (2012). Comitative Coordination in Q’anjob’al. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, Papers in Semantics, 16, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v22i0.3160
- Shabani, M., Kordezaferanlou, A., Aghagolzadeh, F., & Golfam, A. (2010). Co-ordinating Construction in Persian. Adabpazhuhi, 131, 113-156. 20.1001.1.17358027.1389.4.13.6.8
- Stassen, Leon. (2000). AND-languages and WITH-languages. Linguistic Typology, 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.1
', './data/jlr/coversheet/441709033614.png'))