The Role of Phonological Strength in the Occurrence of Fortition Processes in Persian Languages Based on the Approaches of Foley and Vennemann

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 Ph.D. in General Linguistics, Department of Literature and Humanity, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Phonologists have spoken about lenition and fortition for more than a century; in fact, for as long as phonology has existed. The first scientific terminology that was introduced in the 19th century in order to talk about manner distinctions is based on the intuition that sounds naturally range on a scale which expresses strength.
This paper studies the role of phonological strength in the occurrence of fortition processes in Persian language. The fortition processes of glide occlusivization, glide fricativization, glide affrication and buccalization according to the concepts of «positional strength», «assimilative strength» and «the inertial development principle» (Foley, 1977), and «the preference laws for syllable structure» (Vennemann, 1988) are analyzed.
The questions posed in the present study are: 1- In the occurrence of each of the processes of glide occlusivization, glide fricativization, glide affrication, and devoicing and buccalization, which of the factors mentioned in the Foley approach (1977) have a role? 2- To what extent have the mentioned processes been done in order to improve the structure of the syllable according to the " the preference laws for syllable structure" (Vennemann, 1988)? 3- What is the explanation for the role of "phonological strength" in the emergence of Persian language strengthening processes?

Keywords

References

  1. Alinezhad, B., & Hasan Azmoode. (2014). Deletion process and markedness of the place of articulaion in Persian language. Journal of comparative linguistics. 4 (8), 11-26. (in Persian) https://doi.org/ 10.22067/lj.v11i1.46465
  2. Aram, Y.,& Safvat, A. (2016). A corpus-based study of lenition and fortition in the historuical periods of Persian language. Journal of comparative linguistics, 2 (11), 159-176. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22084/RJHLL.2016.1528
  3. Bartholomae, C. (2005). History of Persian phonemes (Trans:Vahe Doomanian).Tehran: Institute of humanities and cultural studies.(in Persian)
  4. Foley, J. (1977). Foundations of theoretical phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Ghatreh, F., Asiaee, M., & Rahandaz, S. (2020). A morphophonetic approach to Hiatus in spoken Persian language.  Journal of Language Research, 12 (35), 297-318. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22051/jlr.2019.21700.1587
  6. Hübschmann, H. (2007). Phonetic evolution of Persian language from Indoeuropian to Modern Persian (Trans: Bezad Moeeni Sam).  Tehran: Amir Kabir [In Persian].
  7. Jam. B. (2009). Optimality theory and its application in explaining phonological processes of Persian. Tarbiat Modarres University .(in Persian)
  8. Kambuziya, A., & Eslami, F., (2015). Syllable structure in Old, Middle and Modern Persian: A contrastive analysis. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 7 (2), 122-144. https://doi.org/10.22111/IJALS.2015.2675
  9. Kambuziya, A. (2006). Phonology: Rule-based approaches. Tehran: SAMT (in Persian)
  10. Kent, R. G. (1953). Old Persian: Grammar, Texts, Lexicon. American Oriental Society.
  11. Lavoie, L. (1996). Consonant strength: Results of a data base development project. Working Papers of Cornel Phonetics Laboratory, 11, 269-316. https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.3733529
  12. Mackenzie, D. N. (2005). A concise Pahlavi dictionary (Trans: Mahshid Mirfakhraie).Tehran: Institute of humanities and cultural studies. (in Persian)
  13. Mailhammer, R., Restle, D., &  Vennemann, T. (2015). Preference laws in phonological change. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology (pp. 450-466). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.013.032
  14. Mobaraki, M. (2013). Fortition in Persian phonological system. Journal of Education and Practice, 23 (4), 110-118. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/8411/8717
  15. Modarresi Ghavami, G. (2012). Phonetics: The scientific study of speech. Tehran: SAMT. (in Persian)
  16. Navidi Baghi, S. (2013). A study of the phonotactics of polysyllabic simple words in Persian language (Master thesis). Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)
  17. Nyberg, H. S. (2011). A manual of Pahlavi: Description of Words and grammar. Tehran: Asatir. (in Persian)
  18. Restle, D., & Vennemann, T. (2001). Silbenstruktur. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds), Language typology and language universals (vol. 2. pp. 1310–1336). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,.
  19. Vennemann, T. (1988). Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change: With special    reference to German, Italian, and Latin. Mouton:de Gruyter.
ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research)
Volume 15, Issue 46
May 2023
Pages 213-231

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics