رابطه درک فعل و تولید فعل در بین فارسی آموزان غیربومی بر اساس رویکرد نقش گرای نظام مند

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه زبا‌ شناسی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان، گروه زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

چکیده

این پژوهش به بررسی روابط بین درک و تولید فعل‌ها در نوشتار زبان فارسی به‌عنوان زبان دوم بر پایة فرایندهای فرانقش اندیشگانی در دستور نقش‌گرای نظامند هلیدی پرداخته‌است. جامعة آماری پژوهش فارسی‌آموزان مرکز آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد است. گرد‌آوری داده‌ها به‌صورت میدانی و با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی انجام شده‌است که به دو شیوة آزمون، مصاحبه و انشا بوده‌است و خود به دو بخش درک و تولید فعل دسته‌بندی شده‌اند. داده‌های مربوط به درک فعل از طریق آزمون‌ها و داده‌های مربوط به تولید فعل از طریق انشاها گردآوری شده‌است. در نهایت، پس از ارزیابی داده‌ها به‌وسیلة نرم افزار اس.پی.اس.اس، این یافته به دست آمد که بین درک و تولید فرایند ذهنی در سطح مقدماتی و بین درک و تولید فرایند ذهنی در سطح متوسط، همبستگی مثبت وجود دارد. همچنین، بین درک و تولید فرایند رفتاری در سطح متوسط و درک و تولید فرایند مادی در سطح پیشرفته همبستگی منفی وجود داشت. این خود نشان‌دهندة تأثیر سه عامل در ایجاد رابطة همبستگی مثبت و منفی بین فرایندها در فارسی‌آموزان خارجی بود: 1. میزان عینی و ذهنی‌بودن فرایندها 2. پرکاربردبودن فرایند‌ها 3. سطح زبان‌آموزان.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Relationship between Verb Comprehension and Verb Production among Non-Native Persian Learners Based on Systematic Functional Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hossein Razavian 1
  • Maryam Feizi 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of General Linguistics, Semnan University, Iran
2 Department of General linguistics, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Semnan University,
چکیده [English]

This research has been done to investigate the relationship between verb comprehension and verb production of Persian learners in Persian language writing as a second language, based on the processes of ideational metafunction in Halliday’s systemic functional grammar. The statistical population was the Persian learners of the international center of teaching Persian to non-Persian speakers in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. The data collection method was based on field study and random sampling method. The data were gathered through tests, interviews and essays which were divided into two parts: verb comprehension and verb production. The results of the tests were analyzed for verb comprehension, while the outputs of compositions were used in verb production. The collected data then were analyzed by SPSS. The results indicated that there was a positive correlation between comprehension and verb production of mental process at elementary levels. On the other hand, no correlation was found between Persian learners’ verb comprehension and verb production at intermediate level. Furthermore, there was a negative correlation between comprehension and production of the behavioral process at intermediate level and the comprehension and production of the material process at the advanced level. This showed the effect of three factors on creating a positive and negative correlation between processes in foreign Persian learners: 1) the objectivity and subjectivity of processes, 2) the versatility of processes, 3) Persian learners’ language level.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • verb
  • comprehension
  • production
  • process
  • functional‌‌ grammar
  • foreign Persian learners

مراجع

  1. Aghaee Majarshin, N. (2012). Mechanism of Designing Syllabus for Elementary Persian Learner Based on Hallidayˈs Theory of Language Learning. M.A thesis, university of Semnan.
  2. Bates E, Marchman V, Thal D, Fenson L, Dale P, Reznick JS, Reilly J, Hartung J. (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 21(1):85-123. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900008680. PMID: 8006096.
  3. Bazyar, M. (2012). The Discourse Analysis of the Process Types of the Persian Aphasic Texts: A Systemic-Functional Approach. Faculty of Literature and Foreign Languages, Ph.D thesis, Allame Tabataba'i University.
  4. Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English: A Halliday Approach. London: Arnold.
  5. Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., & Tanaka, M. (2008). Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua, 118, 172-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003.
  6. Butler, C. S. (2003). Structure and Function: A Guild to Three Major Structural - Functional Theories. Part 1: Approach to the simplex clause. Studies in Language Companion Series- SLCS- Vol. 63. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
  7. Eggines, s. (2004). An Introduction to Systematic Functional Linguistics. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  8. Feizi, M. (2015). Verb Learning in Teaching Persian to Non-Persian Speakers Based on Functional Approach.  M.A Thesis, university of Semnan.
  9. Giyasiyan, M. S. (2001). Analyzing of Syntactic-Semantic Classification of Persian Verbs Based on Hallidayʾs Systematic Functional Grammar. Proceedings of the Fifth Linguistics Conference, 52, 521-550.
  10. Hackett, A., MacLure, M., & McMahon, S. (2021). Reconceptualising early language development: matter, sensation and the more-than-human. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 42(6), 913-929. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1767350.
  11. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a Language Based Theory for Learning. Linguistics and education, 5(2), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7.
  12. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Revise by Christian M.I.M. Matthiesse. New York: Arnold.
  13. Halliday, M.A.K. (2003). On the architecture of human language. On Language and Linguistics, Volume 3 in the Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. London and New York: Equinox.
  14. Halliday, M.A.K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Revise by Christian M.I.M. Matthiesse. New York: Arnold.
  15. Halliday, M. A. K., Webster, J. (2006). The Language of Early Child: vol.4 (collected works of M. A. K. Halliday). Britain: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  16. Hallidy, M.AK. (2014). Introduction to Functional Grammar, Revised by Christian M.I.M Matthiessen. USA and Canada: Routledge.
  17. Jaspers, J. (2018). The Transformative Limits of Translanguaging. Language & Communication, 58, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2017.12.001
  18. Morly. G. D. (2000). Syntax in Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Functional Grammer in Systemic Linguistics. London & New York: Continuum.
  19. Nation, K. (2019). Children’s reading difficulties, language, and reflections on the simple view of reading. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 24(1), 47-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2019.1609272.
  20. Pahlavannezhad, R., & Najafi, A. (2008). The Importance of the Communicative Function of Language in Child Language Development. Educational Innovations, 7(5), 47-74. https://noavaryedu.oerp.ir/article_78890.html?lang=en.
  21. Tabrizimanesh, M. (2006). Analyzing of set of Farsi biyamuzim based on ideational metafunction in Hallidayʾs systematic functional grammar M.A. thesis, university of Shahid Beheshti.
  22. Wei, L. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9-30.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039.
  23. Vainio, L. (2019). Connection between movements of mouth and hand: Perspectives on development and evolution of speech. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 100, 211-223. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 11. PMID: 30871957.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار