نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی رشته فرهنگ و زبان های باستانی ایران، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه زبانشناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
3 استاد گروه فرهنگ و زبانهای باستانی ایران، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
4 استادیار گروه فرهنگ و زبانهای باستانی ایران، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Inflected languages use different cases to convey different meanings depending on the context of the sentence. Old Persian has seven cases, including the accusative case. This case is used in intransitive, transitive, and ditransitive constructions, and can have different functions and semantic roles based on the sentence's context. This article focuses on investigating the verbs that are used with two accusative cases in Old Persian and the characteristics and semantic roles these cases imply. In transitive constructions, one of the objects in the accusative case indicates the semantic role of the theme/patient, while the other object in the accusative case indicates the semantic role of the destination, manner, object complement, and source-maleficiary. Passive sentences containing verbs with double accusative cases in Old Persian are rare, making it somewhat difficult to examine their characteristics. However, we can cautiously say that verbs related to asking and requesting and the maleficiary ditransitive structures can be included among the structures of double accusative, and both accusative cases have the same characteristics. The study also investigates the analogs of the studied verbs in the Avesta language. The result shows that these Avestan verbs are not necessarily associated with double accusative cases with the same semantic roles.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)